Digital Media Law Project
Published on Digital Media Law Project (https://www.dmlp.org)

Home > Vision Media TV Group v. Forte

Vision Media TV Group v. Forte [1]

Submitted by DMLP Staff on Tue, 01/26/2010 - 18:50

Summary

Threat Type: 

Lawsuit

Date: 

03/09/2009

Status: 

Pending

Location: 

Florida

Verdict or Settlement Amount: 

N/A

Legal Claims: 

Defamation
Trademark Dilution
In February 2009, Vision Media TV, a company that makes video segments that advertise nonprofit companies, sued Julia Forte, who runs the website 800Notes, a forum site on which members of the public can discuss telemarketing companies and practices. Vision... read full description
Parties

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

Julia Forte; Julia Forte d/b/a www.800Notes.com Advent LLC

Type of Party: 

Organization

Type of Party: 

Individual
Organization

Location of Party: 

  • Florida

Location of Party: 

  • North Carolina

Legal Counsel: 

Lee Edward Levenson , Jr. - Greenspoon Marder Hirschfeld Rafkin Ross & Berger; Geoffrey David Ittleman-Geoffrey D Ittleman PA

Legal Counsel: 

Paul Alan Levy, Deepak Gupta - Public Citizen Litigation Group; Judith M. Mercier - Holland & Knight, LLP
Description

In February 2009, Vision Media TV, a company that makes video segments that advertise nonprofit companies, sued Julia Forte, who runs the website 800Notes [2], a forum site on which members of the public can discuss telemarketing companies and practices. Vision Media filed suit in federal district court in Florida after Forte refused to identify users who posted critical comments about the company and to remove the postings. The complaint [3], which has been amended several times, currently includes claims for libel, trademark dilution under Florida law, and "defamation by implication."

In January 2010, Forte moved to dismiss the complaint [4], or alternatively for summary judgment.  She argued, among other things, that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over her, and that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act [5] immunized her for publishing the statements of her users.  In an unusual move, Vision Media TV moved to strike [6] Forte's motion to dismiss because her counsel posted the motion papers on the Public Citizen Litigation Group website. 

Update:

1/27/10 - Forte filed an Opposition to Motion to Strike and for Gag Order [7].

2/04/10 - The Court denied [8] the Motion to Strike. 

Related Links: 

  • CL&P Blog: Vision Media TV Tries to Evade Section 230 Immunity to Squelch Criticism [9]
  • Public Citizen Litigation Group: Vision Media v. Forte [10]
  • Techdirt: New Attempt to Get Around Section 230 in Apparent Effort to Bury Small Site with Legal Expenses [11]
  • Techdirt: Vision Media Would Apparently Prefer No Public Discussion About Its Lawsuit [12]
  • CMLP: Vision Media TV Group v. Richard [13]
Details

Web Site(s) Involved: 

800Notes [2]

Content Type: 

  • Text

Publication Medium: 

Forum

Subject Area: 

  • Third-Party Content
  • Section 230
  • Personal Jurisdiction
  • Consumer Ratings and Reviews
Court Information & Documents

Jurisdiction: 

  • Florida

Source of Law: 

  • Florida

Court Name: 

United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

Court Type: 

Federal

Case Number: 

9:09-cv-80396

Relevant Documents: 

PDF icon 2009-03-09-Vision Media Complaint.pdf [14]
PDF icon 2009-07-01-Vision Media Amended Complaint.pdf [15]
PDF icon 2009-12-18-Vision Media Second Amended Complaint and Petition for Injunction.pdf [16]
PDF icon 2010-01-21-Forte Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment.pdf [17]
PDF icon 2010-01-21-Forte Statement of Material Facts.pdf [18]
PDF icon 2010-01-25-Vision Media Motion to Strike Defendants Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment for Posting Motions on Website.pdf [19]
PDF icon 2010-01-27-Forte Opposition to Motion to Strike and for Gag Order.pdf [20]
PDF icon 2010-02-04 - Forte Denial of Gag Order.pdf [21]
CMLP Information (Private)

Priority: 

1-High

CMLP Notes: 

2/19/10 -AVM added motion to strike denial

DMLP Logo


Source URL (modified on 08/20/2014 - 11:10pm): https://www.dmlp.org/threats/vision-media-tv-group-v-forte

Links
[1] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/vision-media-tv-group-v-forte
[2] http://800notes.com/
[3] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-12-18-Vision%20Media%20Second%20Amended%20Complaint%20and%20Petition%20for%20Injunction.pdf
[4] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2010-01-21-Forte%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss%20or%20for%20Summary%20Judgment.pdf
[5] https://www.dmlp.org/section-230
[6] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2010-01-25-Vision%20Media%20Motion%20to%20Strike%20Defendants%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss%20or%20for%20Summary%20Judgment%20for%20Posting%20Motions%20on%20Website.pdf
[7] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2010-01-27-Forte%20Opposition%20to%20Motion%20to%20Strike%20and%20for%20Gag%20Order.pdf
[8] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2010-02-04 - Forte Denial of Gag Order.pdf
[9] http://pubcit.typepad.com/clpblog/2010/01/vision-media-tv-tries-to-evade-section-230-immunity-to-squelch-criticism.html
[10] http://www.citizen.org/litigation/forms/cases/CaseDetails.cfm?cID=591
[11] http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100122/0236407864.shtml
[12] http://techdirt.com/articles/20100128/1558417967.shtml
[13] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/vision-media-tv-group-v-richard
[14] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-03-09-Vision%20Media%20Complaint.pdf
[15] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-07-01-Vision%20Media%20Amended%20Complaint.pdf
[16] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-12-18-Vision%20Media%20Second%20Amended%20Complaint%20and%20Petition%20for%20Injunction.pdf
[17] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2010-01-21-Forte%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss%20or%20for%20Summary%20Judgment.pdf
[18] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2010-01-21-Forte%20Statement%20of%20Material%20Facts.pdf
[19] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2010-01-25-Vision%20Media%20Motion%20to%20Strike%20Defendants%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss%20or%20for%20Summary%20Judgment%20for%20Posting%20Motions%20on%20Website.pdf
[20] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2010-01-27-Forte%20Opposition%20to%20Motion%20to%20Strike%20and%20for%20Gag%20Order.pdf
[21] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2010-02-04%20-%20Forte%20Denial%20of%20Gag%20Order.pdf