Welcome to the Citizen Media Law Brief, a weekly newsletter highlighting recent blog posts, media law news, legal threat entries, and other new content on the Citizen Media Law Project's website. You are receiving this email because you have expressed interest in the CMLP or registered on our site, www.citmedialaw.org. If you do not wish to receive this newsletter, you can unsubscribe by following the link at the bottom of this email or by going to http://www.citmedialaw.org/newsletter/subscriptions.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The latest from the Citizen Media Law Project blog...
AutoAdmit Update: "A Horse Walks Into A Bar" Gets Feisty
Jason Crow comments on Professor Wasserman's new article on video evidence.
The Flipside of 1984: The Public Watching Big Brother
Sam Bayard looks at one blogger's response to a trademark demand.
Blogger Bullied Over Phrase "Branded Community"
David Ardia evaluates a real estate developer's libel lawsuit against two homeowners.
California Developer Sues Homeowners for Libel Over Disparaging Blog Comments
Sam Bayard reports on the Newspaper Tree's motion
to unseal a public corruption prosecution in Texas.
Online News Site Challenges Secret Court Proceedings
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Recent threats added to the CMLP database...
Murawski v. Gunzburger
Posted August 13, 2008
Matteo v. Rubin
Posted August 13, 2008
FreeLife International v. Burge
Posted August 13, 2008
Woody v. Carter
Posted August 11, 2008
Wargo v. Lavandeira
Posted August 11, 2008
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Other citizen media law news...
Google faces defamation lawsuit in India
Reuters - Fri. 08/15/08
Blogger ordered to reveal sources
Al Jazeera English - Thurs. 08/14/08
China: Citizen reporter Zuola carted off
Global Voices Online - Thurs. 08/14/08
Olympic Committee Takedown Shows Risks of Ill-Timed Take-downs
EFF Deep Links - Wed. 08/13/08
huge and important news: free licenses upheld
Lessig Blog - Wed. 08/13/08
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
The full(er) Brief...
Sam Bayard, AutoAdmit Update: "A Horse Walks Into A Bar" Gets Feisty
"A recent post on Prawfs Blawg by Professor Howard Wasserman further explores some of the questions raised in my post, Searching for Both Sides of Body Slam Video, where I discuss some of the problems with videos that document forceful arrests. Prof. Wasserman's post profiles a video
depicting someone being forcibly removed from a press conference by
Dino Rossi, the state of Washington GOP gubernatorial candidate, and a
discussion of his recent paper, 'Orwells Vision: Video and the Future of Civil Rights Enforcement,' that provides an analysis of the constitutional and civil rights that videos like this one may be protecting. The video is strikingly similar to the videos I describe in my previous
post on the subject: a seemingly innocent person gets forcibly dragged
out of a room while a handheld video camera captures everything. . . ."
Jason Crow, The Flipside of 1984: The Public Watching Big Brother
"Denise Howell at Lawgarithms points us in the direction of a recent legal threat that goes right to the intersection of trademark law and freedom of speech. On July 26, 2008, Rob Frankel of i-legions sent an email to tech blogger Jennifer Leggio of ZDNet Feeds complaining about a post by guest author Aaron Strout that used the term 'branded communities.' Frankel indicated that i-legions owns a federally registered trademark
in the term 'branded communities' and claimed that Leggio 'should not
be using the term at all without our express written consent.' Strout's July 23, 2008 post
functioned as a 'primer' on what steps online businesses should take in
evaluating their 'community engagement strategies.' It used the term 'branded communities' in the ordinary, if slightly business-speak-y, sense to refer to an online community sponsored by a
brand. . . ."
Sam Bayard, Blogger Bullied Over Phrase "Branded Community"
"Los Angeles real estate developer Barry Shy and his development company, 5th St Loft, have sued Jessica Jordan and Alan
Dylan, who reside in a building developed by Shy and run the
website Truedowntown, the 'unofficial' site for the Shybary Grand Loft in Los Angeles. The lawsuit,
which plaintiffs filed on June 17, 2008, claims that Jordan and Dylan
libeled Shy and damaged his businesses by making disparaging comments
about him. . . . But it isn't the first time we've seen a real estate developer use a
libel lawsuit to silence critical speech. We've collected at least
seven such cases in our database of legal threats (see, e.g., Woody v. Carter, Jaeger v. Okon, Veranda Partners v. Giles,
Hollo v. Lechuga, Montana Holdings v. Doe, McMann v. Doe 1, and McMann v. Doe 2).
While not all of these cases are meritless attempts to stifle
legitimate criticism, they invariably pit wealthy and well-connected
business owners against individuals and community organizations with
limited financial resources to defend themselves. Not surprisingly,
many defendants simply give up when faced with million dollar lawsuits. . . ."
David Ardia, California Developer Sues Homeowners for Libel Over Disparaging Blog Comments
"Last Wednesday, the Newspaper Tree, an online news site out of El Paso, Texas, which focuses on business, politics, and culture in the region, filed a motion
objecting to an El Paso federal court's sealing of plea hearings and
court documents in the pre-trial phases of a large public corruption
prosecution. . . . In May 2008, Judge Montalvo rejected
a similar motion by a community activist to open the court's
proceedings, ruling that the government's interest in the integrity of
its ongoing investigation and in preventing witness intimidation
outweighed the public's interest in access. At that time, the court
released a few documents in redacted form, but refused to provide
access to plea hearings (including putting the date of such hearings on
the public docket or providing transcripts), plea agreements, and
affidavits filed in support of warrants in the case. The community activist who filed the previous motion represented
himself, raising the possibility that the court did not have the
benefit of the best arguments in favor of access. . . ."
Sam Bayard, Online News Site Challenges Secret Court Proceedings



