Links
[1] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/wal-mart-v-smith-letters
[2] http://www.citizen.org/litigation/forms/cases/CaseDetails.cfm?cID=206
[3] http://www.commondreams.org/news2008/0321-07.htm
[4] http://www.citizen.org/pressroom/release.cfm?ID=2148
[5] http://www.likelihoodofconfusion.com/?p=1444
[6] http://randazza.wordpress.com/2008/03/23/no-you-cant-use-trademark-law-to-stifle-critics/
[7] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/wal-mart-v-smith-counterclaims
[8] http://www.walocaust.com/site/
[9] http://www.walqaeda.com/
[10] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2006-03-06-Smith%20Complaint.pdf
[11] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2007-05-11-Smith%20Memorandum%20in%20Support%20of%20Summary%20Judgment.pdf
[12] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2007-06-08-Smith%20Opposition%20to%20Wal-Mart%27s%20Motion%20for%20Summary%20Judgment.pdf
[13] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2007-07-23-Smith%20Reply%20Memorandum%20in%20Support%20of%20Summary%20Judgment.pdf
[14] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-03-20-Order%20Granting%20Summary%20Judgment.pdf
[15] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2006-03-28-Wal-Mart%27s%20Answer%20and%20Counterclaims.pdf