Digital Media Law Project
Published on Digital Media Law Project (https://www.dmlp.org)

Home > Holmgren v. Murrieta Opinion

Holmgren v. Murrieta Opinion [1]

Submitted by DMLP Staff on Fri, 10/17/2008 - 13:51

Summary

Threat Type: 

Lawsuit

Date: 

03/06/2008

Status: 

Pending

Disposition: 

Dismissed (total)

Location: 

California

Verdict or Settlement Amount: 

N/A

Legal Claims: 

Defamation
Roy Holmgren sued the Murrietta Opinion and About Murrieta blogs, as well anonymous operators and/or commenters to these blogs, for defamation in California state court in March 2008. The complaint alleged that the defendants published... read full description
Parties

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

Murrieta Opinion; About Murrieta; Jeffrey W. Kleiner; John Does

Type of Party: 

Individual
Organization

Type of Party: 

Individual

Location of Party: 

  • California

Location of Party: 

  • California

Legal Counsel: 

Richard D. Ackerman - Ackerman, Cowles & Associates

Legal Counsel: 

None
Description

Roy Holmgren sued the Murrietta Opinion [2] and About Murrieta [3]blogs, as well anonymous operators and/or commenters to these blogs, for defamation in California state court in March 2008. The complaint [4] alleged that the defendants published false statements about Holmgren on the two blogs, including statements that he was a stalker, that he was married to an illegal alien, and that he committed crimes that destroyed property. Cmplt. ¶ 9.

The case did not move forward for several months because Holmgren did not know the identities of the blog operators and commenters. Blogspot, the hosting service for the two blogs, refused to cooperate with Holmgren's request for identifying information.

After some investigation, Holmgren amended the complaint [5] in Sepember 2008, naming Jeffrey Kleiner as the operator of the Murrieta Opinion blog. According to an affidavit [6], Holmgren mailed the amended complaint to Kleiner, but he has not served or identified any other defendants.

Update:

12/15/2008 - Court issued an Order to Show Cause [7] to Holmgren requiring him to show why sanctions of $150.00 on the 1st Amended Complaint should not be ordered for failure to file proof of service of summons.

Case is ongoing: A case management hearing is scheduled for 8/07/2009.

According to a comment [8] posted below, the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the case after being unable to locate the defendant.

Related Links: 

  • North County Times: Murrieta man sues local blog site [9]
  • I Found a Peanut: Defamation on the Internet: Roy Holmgren Sues Murrieta Blog and Anonymous Posters [10]
  • Court Docket [11]
Details

Web Site(s) Involved: 

Murrieta Opinion [2]

About Murrieta [3]

[2]

Content Type: 

  • Text

Publication Medium: 

Blog

Subject Area: 

  • Defamation
  • Third-Party Content
  • Anonymity
  • User Comments or Submissions
Court Information & Documents

Jurisdiction: 

  • California

Source of Law: 

  • California

Court Name: 

Superior Court of California, Riverside County

Court Type: 

State

Case Number: 

RIC494950

Relevant Documents: 

PDF icon 2008-03-06-Holmgren Complaint.pdf [12]
PDF icon 2008-09-19-Holmgren First Amended Complaint.pdf [13]
PDF icon 2008-09-09-Declaration of Richard D. Ackerman.pdf [14]
CMLP Information (Private)

Priority: 

1-High

CMLP Notes: 

Update 2/12/09 - VAF

AVM 6-15 - 09 , updated and added court docket link

DMLP Logo


Source URL (modified on 08/20/2014 - 11:06pm): https://www.dmlp.org/threats/holmgren-v-murrieta-opinion

Links
[1] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/holmgren-v-murrieta-opinion
[2] http://murrietaopinion.blogspot.com/
[3] http://aboutmurrieta.blogspot.com/
[4] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-03-06-Holmgren%20Complaint.pdf
[5] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-09-19-Holmgren%20First%20Amended%20Complaint.pdf
[6] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-09-09-Declaration%20of%20Richard%20D.%20Ackerman.pdf
[7] http://public-access.riverside.courts.ca.gov/OpenAccess/CIVIL/civilminutes.asp?courtcode=A&casenumber=494950&casetype=RIC&dsn=&actionseq=4&actiondate=20081215&actiontime=8%2E3&department=06&actioncode=HSCS2&action=%3Cfont+color%3D%27%23000000%27%3EORDER+TO+SHOW+CAUSE+HEARING+WHY+SANCTIONS+OF+%24150%2E00+ON+THE+1ST+AMENDED+COMPLAINT+OF+ROY++HOLMGREN+AS+TO+ABOUT+MURRIETA+BLOG%2C+MURRIETABLOGSPOT%2ECOM+SHOULD+NOT+BE+ORDERED+FOR+FAILURE+TO+FILE+PROOF+OF+SERVICE+OF+SUMMONS%2E++%3C%2Ffont%3E
[8] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/holmgren-v-murrieta-opinion#comment-1802
[9] http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2008/03/07/news/top_stories/22_20_343_6_08.txt
[10] http://ifoundapeanut.blogspot.com/2008/03/ground-breaking-internet-lawsuit-ray.html
[11] http://public-access.riverside.courts.ca.gov/OpenAccess/CIVIL/civildetails.asp?casenumber=494950&courtcode=A&casetype=RIC&dsn=
[12] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-03-06-Holmgren%20Complaint.pdf
[13] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-09-19-Holmgren%20First%20Amended%20Complaint.pdf
[14] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-09-09-Declaration%20of%20Richard%20D.%20Ackerman.pdf