Digital Media Law Project
Published on Digital Media Law Project (https://www.dmlp.org)

Home > Orix v. Predatorix

Orix v. Predatorix [1]

Submitted by DMLP Staff on Wed, 04/22/2009 - 12:05

Summary

Threat Type: 

Lawsuit

Date: 

04/24/2008

Status: 

Concluded

Disposition: 

Material Removed
Retraction Issued
Settled (total)
Verdict (plaintiff)

Location: 

Texas

Verdict or Settlement Amount: 

$12,500,000.00

Legal Claims: 

Conspiracy
Copyright Infringement
Defamation
Tortious Interference
Trade Libel
In the course of an ongoing lawsuit, Orix Capital Markets, LLC filed a counterclaim against Super Future Equities, Inc., Schumann Rafizadeh, Cyrus Rafizadeh, Houman Thomas Arjmandi, and Keon Michael Arjmandi.  The counterclaim alleged that the defendants set up a website -- www.predatorix.com... read full description
Parties

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

Super Future Equities, Inc.; Schumann Rafizadeh; Cyrus Rafizadeh; Houman Thomas Arjmandi; Keon Michael Arjmandi

Type of Party: 

Organization

Type of Party: 

Individual
Organization

Location of Party: 

  • Texas
  • Delaware

Location of Party: 

  • Texas
  • Oklahoma
  • Nevada

Legal Counsel: 

Michael P. Lynn, Richard Smith, Elizabeth Y. McElroy - Lynn Tillotson Pinker & Cox LLP

Legal Counsel: 

Timothy F. Gavin, Charles J. Blanchard, Richard A. Rohan - Carrington Coleman Sloman & Blumenthal; Jeffrey W. Glass - Law Office of Jeffrey W. Glass; Jon P. Bohn - Bohn & Aucloux; Julie A Zanutto - Law Office of Julie A. Zanutto
Description

In the course of an ongoing lawsuit, Orix Capital Markets, LLC filed a counterclaim against Super Future Equities, Inc., Schumann Rafizadeh, Cyrus Rafizadeh, Houman Thomas Arjmandi, and Keon Michael Arjmandi.  The counterclaim alleged that the defendants set up a website -- www.predatorix.com -- that published false and defamatory statements about Orix.  For example, Orix claimed that the website accused the company of committing tax fraud and being under federal investigation for violating racketeering laws.  Later, Orix filed an amended counterclaim to add a copyright infringement claim arising from Predatorix's re-posting of a page from the Orix website.

The defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, which, in March 2008, the court granted in part and denied in part [2].  The court dismissed Orix's claims for business disparagement, tortious interference, and copyright [3] infringement (notably, the court found that Predatorix's use of the Orix page was fair use [4]), but found that the defamation claim was sufficient to go to the jury [4].

In February 2009, after a two-week trial, the jury awarded [5] Orix $2.5 million in compensatory damages and $10 million in punitive damages, split between the defendants, except Keon Michael Arjmandi, who was not found liable.  After the verdict, the parties settled [6] the case on undisclosed terms.  After the settlement, the Rafizadehs published an apology on Predatorix, acknowledging that the postings were incorrect.

Related Links: 

  • Rebecca Tushnet's 43(B)log: Predatory possibly defamatory but not infringing [7]
  • Dallas Morning News: Web site posts apology to Dallas firm in defamation case [8]
  • Yahoo! Finance: Lynn Tillotson Pinker & Cox LLP Obtains $12.5 Million Verdict for Internet Defamation Case [9]

 

Details

Web Site(s) Involved: 

http://www.predatorix.com/ [10]

Content Type: 

  • Text

Publication Medium: 

Website

Subject Area: 

  • Copyright
  • Defamation
  • Fair Use
  • Gripe Sites
Court Information & Documents

Jurisdiction: 

  • Texas

Source of Law: 

  • United States
  • Texas

Court Name: 

United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

Court Type: 

Federal

Case Number: 

3-06-CV-0271-B

Relevant Documents: 

PDF icon 2006-04-24-Orix' Counterclaim.pdf [11]
PDF icon 2006-08-22-Orix' Amended Counterclaim.pdf [12]
PDF icon 2008-03-17-Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment in Part and Denying in Part.pdf [13]
PDF icon 2009-02-12-Agreed Order of Dismissal With Prejudice.pdf [14]
PDF icon 2009-02-05-Orix Jury Instructions and Special Verdict Form.pdf [15]
CMLP Information (Private)

Priority: 

2-Normal

CMLP Notes: 

Note that the counterclaim is the threat, not the overall lawsuit. {MCS}

DMLP Logo


Source URL (modified on 08/20/2014 - 11:06pm): https://www.dmlp.org/threats/orix-v-predatorix

Links
[1] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/orix-v-predatorix
[2] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-03-17-Order%20Granting%20Plaintiff%27s%20Motion%20for%20Summary%20Judgment%20in%20Part%20and%20Denying%20in%20Part.pdf
[3] https://www.dmlp.org/glossary/8/letterc#term266
[4] https://www.dmlp.org/glossary/8/letterf#term269
[5] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-02-05-Orix%20Jury%20Instructions%20and%20Special%20Verdict%20Form.pdf
[6] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-02-12-Agreed%20Order%20of%20Dismissal%20With%20Prejudice.pdf
[7] http://tushnet.blogspot.com/2008/03/predatorix-possibly-defamatory-but-not.html
[8] http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/bus/stories/021109dnbusdefame.3f3fc8f.html
[9] http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Lynn-Tillotson-Pinker-amp-Cox-prnews-14356233.html
[10] http://www.predatorix.com/
[11] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2006-04-24-Orix%27%20Counterclaim.pdf
[12] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2006-08-22-Orix%27%20Amended%20Counterclaim.pdf
[13] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-03-17-Order%20Granting%20Plaintiff%27s%20Motion%20for%20Summary%20Judgment%20in%20Part%20and%20Denying%20in%20Part.pdf
[14] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-02-12-Agreed%20Order%20of%20Dismissal%20With%20Prejudice.pdf
[15] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-02-05-Orix%20Jury%20Instructions%20and%20Special%20Verdict%20Form.pdf