Digital Media Law Project
Published on Digital Media Law Project (https://www.dmlp.org)

Home > Privé Vegas, LLC v. Politz

Privé Vegas, LLC v. Politz [1]

Submitted by DMLP Staff on Mon, 08/25/2008 - 18:24

Summary

Threat Type: 

Lawsuit

Date: 

08/20/2008

Status: 

Pending

Location: 

Nevada

Verdict or Settlement Amount: 

N/A

Legal Claims: 

Defamation
Extortion
Tortious Interference
Trademark Infringement
Trademark Dilution
Trade Libel
Privé Vegas, LLC and two of its owners sued Las Vegas-based blogger Michael Politz in August 2008, alleging trademark infringement, dilution, and "disaparagement" under the Lanham Act, defamation, trade libel, tortious interference with business relations, and extortion. The company operates... read full description
Parties

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

Michael Politz; Does 1 through IV; Roe Corporations XVI through XXX

Type of Party: 

Individual
Organization

Type of Party: 

Individual

Location of Party: 

  • Florida
  • Nevada

Location of Party: 

  • Nevada

Legal Counsel: 

Fred "Pete" Gibson, III, Christopher Mathews, Mohamed A. Iqbal, Jr. - Lionel Sawyer & Collins

Legal Counsel: 

James E Whitmire, III - Santoro, Driggs, Walch, Kearney, Johnston & Thompson
Description

Privé Vegas, LLC and two of its owners sued Las Vegas-based blogger Michael Politz in August 2008, alleging trademark infringement, dilution, and "disaparagement" under the Lanham Act [2], defamation, trade libel, tortious interference with business relations, and extortion. The company operates a nightclub called "Privé [3]" in the Planet Hollywood Casino [4] in Las Vegas.  Politz operates the TheVegasEye.com [5] blog, which covers goings-on in the Las Vegas entertainment and hospitality industries and provides restaurant reviews and reports on celebrity sightings and the like.

Prive logo According to the complaint [6], filed in federal district court in Nevada, Politz published a post [7] on July 23, 2008 reporting on a lawsuit Privé brought against four former employees. In his post, Politz allegedly made false statements about the lawsuit and about management "shaking down" employees for tip money to be placed in a "Slush Fund." Cmplt. ¶ 20. At the top of his post, Politz included a graphic of  Privé's trademark (shown on the right).

In addition, on August 12, 2008, Politz allegedly posted [8] on his blog an anonymous letter to the State of Nevada Gaming Control Board [9], which purported to be written by a former employee of Privé.  The letter made a number of allegedly defamatory statements, including that Privé forced employees to work late hours without pay, that management sold drugs through the nightclub, and that management allowed underaged girls to enter the club and served them liquor. Cmplt. ¶¶ 25, 28, 30, 32, 33. At the top of the post, Politz included a graphic of the Privé trademark surrounded by a red circle with a line through it:

Prive logo 2

The nightclub filed suit in federal court after Politz did not comply with a demand letter sent in August.

Related Links: 

  • Justia: Case Docket [10]
  • TheVegasEye.com: Eye-Exclusive Prive Exposed [8]
  • TheVegasEye.com: Is the Prive Ship Starting to Sink? [7]
  • Las Vegas Trademark Attorney: Privé Nightclub Files Libel Lawsuit Against Vegas Blogger Under Guise of Trademark Infringement [11]
  • CMLP: Vegas Nightclub's Trademark Claims Against Blogger Likely a Bust [12]
Details

Web Site(s) Involved: 

TheVegasEye.com [5]

Content Type: 

  • Text
  • Graphic

Publication Medium: 

Blog

Subject Area: 

  • Defamation
  • Trademark
  • Trade Libel
Court Information & Documents

Jurisdiction: 

  • Nevada

Source of Law: 

  • United States
  • Nevada

Court Name: 

United States District Court for the District of Nevada

Court Type: 

Federal

Case Number: 

2:08-cv-01104

Relevant Documents: 

PDF icon 2008-08-20-Prive Complaint.pdf [13]
PDF icon 2008-10-06-Politz Answer.pdf [14]
CMLP Information (Private)

Threat Source: 

Google Blogs

CMLP Notes: 

to-do: create entry for demand letter, see para 47 of complaint.  be careful when drafting this entry -- we don't want to repeat the allegations/defamatory statements unless they are referenced to the complaint, which may be kind of awkward in a correspondence threat.

DMLP Logo


Source URL (modified on 08/20/2014 - 11:07pm): https://www.dmlp.org/threats/priv%C3%A9-vegas-llc-v-politz

Links
[1] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/priv%C3%A9-vegas-llc-v-politz
[2] http://www.bitlaw.com/source/15usc/
[3] http://www.privelv.com/site.html
[4] http://www.planethollywoodresort.com/
[5] http://thevegaseye.com/home/
[6] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-08-20-Prive%20Complaint.pdf
[7] http://thevegaseye.com/home/2008/7/24/is-the-prive-ship-starting-to-sink.html
[8] http://thevegaseye.com/home/2008/8/22/eye-exclusive-prive-exposed.html
[9] http://gaming.nv.gov/
[10] http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-nvdce/case_no-2:2008cv01104/case_id-61469/
[11] https://www.dmlp.org/Privé
[12] https://www.dmlp.org/blog/2008/vegas-nightclubs-trademark-claims-against-blogger-likely-bust
[13] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-08-20-Prive%20Complaint.pdf
[14] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-10-06-Politz%20Answer.pdf