Digital Media Law Project
Published on Digital Media Law Project (https://www.dmlp.org)

Home > Park West Galleries v. Fine Art Registry

Park West Galleries v. Fine Art Registry [1]

Submitted by DMLP Staff on Wed, 08/05/2009 - 17:02

Summary

Threat Type: 

Lawsuit

Date: 

03/04/2008

Status: 

Pending

Disposition: 

Dismissed (partial)

Location: 

Michigan

Verdict or Settlement Amount: 

N/A

Legal Claims: 

Conspiracy
Defamation
Tortious Interference
Park West Galleries (PWG), an art gallery that also performs auctions on cruise ships, sued Fine Art Registry (FAR), an organization that, according to The Art Newspaper, offers “advocacy to victims of art fraud and abuse” including a system of... read full description
Parties

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

Fine Art Registry; Bruce Hochman; Theresa Franks; David Phillips

Type of Party: 

Organization

Type of Party: 

Individual
Organization

Location of Party: 

  • Michigan

Location of Party: 

  • California
  • Michigan
  • Arizona

Legal Counsel: 

Rodger D. Young, Jason D. Killips, Jaye Quadrozzi - Young & Susser

Legal Counsel: 

Ralph C. Chapa, Jr., Lawrence C. Atorthy - Kaufman & Payton (for Defendants Fine Art Registry, Franks, and Phillips); Ian C. Simpson - Garan Lucow (for Defendant Hochman)
Description

Park West Galleries (PWG), an art gallery that also performs auctions on cruise ships, sued Fine Art Registry (FAR), an organization that, according to The Art Newspaper [2], offers “advocacy to victims of art fraud and abuse” including a system of tagging and registering art, along with Theresa Franks, CEO and founder of FAR, and Bruce Hochman, Gallery Director for the Salvador Dali Gallery in San Juan and art expert for FAR.  (Compl. [3] ¶¶ 2-3, 5-6.) 

According to the complaint [3], FAR, Franks, and Hochman allegedly orchestrated an eleven-month "smear campaign" through the FAR website, making "false and defamatory statements" about PWG in an "attempt[] to destroy Park West's goodwill and reputation."  (Compl. ¶¶ 4, 7, 24.)  Specifically, PWG complains that FAR, Franks, and Hochman have falsely accused it of selling fake artwork during its "at-sea" auctions.  (Compl. ¶25-33.)  PWG is seeking monetary damages and a permanent injunction barring FAR, Franks, and Hochman from making any further defamatory statements.

Shortly after this suit began, PWG brought a similar suit against David Phillips, who participated in an allegedly defamatory interview with Hochman that was posted to FAR's website.  In March, 2009, the court consolidated [4] the two cases.

The court denied [5] Hochman's motion to dismiss [6] for lack of personal jurisdiction or forum non conveniens and improper venue.  FAR and Franks also filed a motion to dismiss [7] for lack of personal jurisdiction and/or improper venue.  The court found [8] that jurisdiction was proper over FAR, but not Franks, and dismissed Franks from the lawsuit.  It denied the request to change venue.

In May 2009, FAR and Phillips filed a counterclaim [9] against PWG, accusing it of a "concerted effort to defame, smear, and destroy the business and personal reputations of F[AR] and P[hillips]."  (Counterclaim [9] ¶ 12.)  The counterclaim includes counts of defamation, tortious interference, interference with prospective business advantage, trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, and conspiracy.  FAR and Phillips are seeking actual and punitive damages.

The court has yet to rule on PWG's motion to dismiss [10] FAR's and Phillips' counterclaim.

Update:

02/26/2010 - The court granted in part and denied in part [11] the motions for summary judgment filed by Global Fine Art Registry, David Charles Phillips, Theresa Franks, and Bruce Hochman and The Salvador Dali Gallery. Among other rulings, the court determined that posting allegedly defamatory statements under a pseudonym triggered a longer statute of limitations period applicable to "fraudulent concealment."

Related Links: 

  • Fine Art Advocacy: Fine Art Registry® Sues Park West Galleries, Inc. for Defamation, Tortious Interference, Trademark Violation and Conspiracy [12]
  • Yahoo Answer: Park west gallery vs fine art registry? [13]
  • The Art Newspaper: Park West sued by customers: Plaintiffs demand refunds for “fake” works as gallery dismisses “smear campaign” [2]
Details

Web Site(s) Involved: 

http://www.fineartregistry.com/ [14]

http://www.fineartadvocacy.com/ [15]

 

Content Type: 

  • Text

Publication Medium: 

Website

Subject Area: 

  • Defamation
  • Personal Jurisdiction
  • Anonymity
Court Information & Documents

Jurisdiction: 

  • Michigan

Source of Law: 

  • United States

Court Name: 

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

Court Type: 

Federal

Case Number: 

2:08-CV-12247

Relevant Documents: 

PDF icon 2008-04-10-Summons and Complaint.pdf [16]
PDF icon 2008-06-10-Hochman Motion to Dismiss.pdf [17]
PDF icon 2008-12-18-Order Denying Hochman Motion to Dismiss.pdf [18]
PDF icon 2009-01-06-Fine Art Registry and Franks Answer.pdf [19]
PDF icon 2009-01-06-Hochman Answer.pdf [20]
PDF icon 2009-01-13-FAR and Franks Motion to Dismiss.pdf [21]
PDF icon 2009-03-19-Order Re FAR and Franks Motion to Dismiss.pdf [22]
PDF icon 2009-05-04-FAR Counterclaim.pdf [23]
PDF icon 2009-05-18-Motion to Dismiss FAR Counterclaim.pdf [24]
PDF icon 2009-03-19-Order to Consolidate Cases.pdf [25]
PDF icon 2010-02-26-Opinion and Order on Motion for Summary Judgment.pdf [26]
CMLP Information (Private)

Priority: 

1-High

DMLP Logo


Source URL (modified on 08/20/2014 - 11:09pm): https://www.dmlp.org/threats/park-west-galleries-v-fine-art-registry

Links
[1] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/park-west-galleries-v-fine-art-registry
[2] http://www.theartnewspaper.com/articles/Park-West-sued-by-customers/16913
[3] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-04-10-Summons%20and%20Complaint.pdf
[4] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-03-19-Order%20to%20Consolidate%20Cases.pdf
[5] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-12-18-Order%20Denying%20Hochman%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.pdf
[6] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-06-10-Hochman%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.pdf
[7] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-01-13-FAR%20and%20Franks%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.pdf
[8] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-03-19-Order%20Re%20FAR%20and%20Franks%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.pdf
[9] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-05-04-FAR%20Counterclaim.pdf
[10] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-05-18-Motion%20to%20Dismiss%20FAR%20Counterclaim.pdf
[11] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2010-02-26-Opinion and Order on Motion for Summary Judgment.pdf
[12] http://www.fineartadvocacy.com/articles/2009/05/fine-art-registry-sues-park-west-galleries-inc-for-defamation-and-conspiracy.php
[13] http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080521141814AASjDkn
[14] http://www.fineartregistry.com/
[15] http://www.fineartadvocacy.com/
[16] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-04-10-Summons%20and%20Complaint.pdf
[17] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-06-10-Hochman%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.pdf
[18] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-12-18-Order%20Denying%20Hochman%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.pdf
[19] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-01-06-Fine%20Art%20Registry%20and%20Franks%20Answer.pdf
[20] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-01-06-Hochman%20Answer.pdf
[21] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-01-13-FAR%20and%20Franks%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.pdf
[22] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-03-19-Order%20Re%20FAR%20and%20Franks%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.pdf
[23] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-05-04-FAR%20Counterclaim.pdf
[24] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-05-18-Motion%20to%20Dismiss%20FAR%20Counterclaim.pdf
[25] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-03-19-Order%20to%20Consolidate%20Cases.pdf
[26] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2010-02-26-Opinion%20and%20Order%20on%20Motion%20for%20Summary%20Judgment.pdf