Links
[1] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/matrixx-initiatives-v-barbary-coast-capital
[2] http://www.metnews.com/articles/2006/matr041906.htm
[3] http://www.graydon.com/index.cfm/fuseaction/news_events.newsletter_detail/object_id/ec3aa235-0d0b-4c9a-aa8f-b28902f37e78/COMPANYLACKSSTANDINGTOASSERTFIRSTAMENDMENTEMPLOYEESEMAILDELIVERYOFCOMPANYINFOMAYVIOLATEFEDERALLAW.cfm
[4] http://www.cyberslapp.org/cases/page.cfm?pageID=61
[5] http://blog.internetcases.com/2006/04/26/company-had-no-standing-to-challenge-discovery-on-behalf-of-anonymous-defamers/
[6] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/matrixx-initiatives-v-john-doe
[7] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/matrixx-initiatives-inc-v-mulligan
[8] http://finance.yahoo.com
[9] http://www.siliconinvestor.com
[10] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/matrixx%20court%20of%20appeals%20decision.pdf
[11] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/matrixx%20respondents%20brief.pdf
[12] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/Matrix%20appelantsopeningbrief%20july%2027%2005.pdf
[13] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/matrixx%20appelantsreplybrief%20sep%2030%2005.pdf