Digital Media Law Project
Published on Digital Media Law Project (https://www.dmlp.org)

Home > Universal Music v. Lenz

Universal Music v. Lenz [1]

Submitted by DMLP Staff on Wed, 11/07/2007 - 10:32

Summary

Threat Type: 

Correspondence

Date: 

06/04/2007

Status: 

Pending

Location: 

Pennsylvania

Verdict or Settlement Amount: 

N/A

Legal Claims: 

Copyright Infringement
In July 2007, Stephanie Lenz sued Universal Music in federal district court in California for claims arising out Universal's sending a DMCA takedown notice to YouTube regarding a video posted by Lenz. According to Lenz's complaint, she posted a video... read full description
Parties

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

Stephanie Lenz

Type of Party: 

Large Organization

Type of Party: 

Individual

Location of Party: 

  • California
  • New York

Location of Party: 

  • Pennsylvania

Legal Counsel: 

Jason Schultz, Corynne McSherry, Marcia Hoffman - Electronic Frontier Foundation

Legal Counsel: 

Kelly Max Klaus, Amy C. Tovar
Description

In July 2007, Stephanie Lenz sued Universal Music in federal district court in California for claims arising out Universal's sending a DMCA takedown notice to YouTube regarding a video posted by Lenz.

According to Lenz's complaint, she posted a video [2] of her toddler son to YouTube in February 2007. In the 29-second video, Lenz's son dances to Prince's "Let's Go Crazy," which is playing in the background. In June 2007, counsel for Universal Music sent YouTube a DMCA takedown notice pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) [3], claiming that the video infringed its copyright in the Prince song and requested that YouTube remove it from the website. YouTube complied and notified Lenz about the takedown. Lenz sent a counter-notification pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 512(g) [3], and the site put the video back up about six weeks later.

Lenz claims that her video does not infringe Universal's copyright because it is fair use. Her federal complaint against Universal alleges that the company violated 17 U.S.C. § 512(f) [3] by knowingly materially misrepresenting its copyright claim in the DMCA takedown notice and requests damages and attorneys fees. The complaint also requests a declaratory judgment that her video did not constitute copyright infringement and injunctive relief to prevent Universal from bringing further copyright claims in connection with the video.

On April 8, 2008, the federal district court granted Universal Music's motion to dismiss the complaint, but granted Lenz permission to amend. She filed her second amended complaint on April 18. 

Update: 

05/23/2008- Universal moved to dismiss Lenz's second amended complaint.

08/20/2008 - The district court denied Universal's motion to dismiss the second amended complaint, holding that copyright owners must consider fair use before sending a DMCA takedown notice.

02/25/2010- The district court granted [4] Lenz's motion for partial summary judgment on various defenses asserted by Universal, but did not resolve the merits. 

Related Links: 

  • ABC News: The Home Video Prince Doesn't Want You to See [5]
  • Electronic Frontier Foundation: Lenz v. Universal [6]
  • Washington Post: Standing Up to Takedown Notices [7]
  • Electronic Frontier Foundation: Mom Sues Universal Music for DMCA Abuse [8]
  • KTVU News: Mom Sues Universal for Blocking YouTube Clip of Toddler [9]
  • NBC 11: Mom Sues Universal Music For Blocking YouTube Video [10]
  • Sunshine Coast Daily (Australia): Purple Party Pooper? [11]
  • BetaNews: EFF Sues Universal Music Over Yanked Baby Dancing Video [12]
  • TMZ: Prince, Record Label Go Crazy over Dancing Baby [13]
  • Blog Herald: Copyright Cases to Watch: Lenz v. Universal [14]
  • Wired.com: EFF and Mom Sue Universal for Removing YouTube Video [15]
  • CNET News Blog: Mother protects YouTube clip by suing Prince [16]

 

Details

Web Site(s) Involved: 

YouTube video [2]

 

Content Type: 

  • Audio
  • Video

Publication Medium: 

Website

Subject Area: 

  • Copyright
  • Fair Use
  • DMCA
Court Information & Documents

Jurisdiction: 

  • Pennsylvania

Source of Law: 

  • United States

Court Name: 

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Court Type: 

Federal

Case Number: 

C 07-03783-MEJ

Relevant Documents: 

PDF icon 2007-08-15-Lenz v. Universal Amended Complaint.pdf [17]
PDF icon 2008-04-08-Order on Universal's Motion to Dismiss.pdf [18]
PDF icon 2008-04-18-Lenz's Amended Complaint.pdf [19]
PDF icon 5-23-2008-Universal Music's Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint.pdf [20]
PDF icon 2008-06-20-Len's Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint.pdf [21]
PDF icon 2008-07-03-Universal's Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint.pdf [22]
PDF icon 2008-08-20-Lenz v. Universal - Order Denying Motion to Dismiss.pdf [23]
PDF icon 2010-02-15-Lenz v. Universal Order on Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.pdf [24]
CMLP Information (Private)

CMLP Notes: 

Updated 08/17/2008. {MCS}

DMLP Logo


Source URL (modified on 08/20/2014 - 11:04pm): https://www.dmlp.org/threats/universal-music-v-lenz

Links
[1] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/universal-music-v-lenz
[2] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1KfJHFWlhQ
[3] http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000512----000-.html
[4] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2010-02-15-Lenz%20v.%20Universal%20Order%20on%20Motion%20for%20Partial%20Summary%20Judgment.pdf
[5] http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/story?id=3777651
[6] http://www.eff.org/cases/lenz-v-universal
[7] http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/18/AR2007101802453.html
[8] http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2007/07/mom-sues-universal-music-dmca-abuse
[9] http://www.ktvu.com/news/13749465/detail.html
[10] http://www.nbc11.com/news/13753339/detail.html
[11] http://www.thedaily.com.au/news/2007/nov/08/purple-party-pooper/
[12] http://www.betanews.com/article/EFF_Sues_Universal_Music_Over_Yanked_Baby_Dancing_Video/1185387561
[13] http://www.tmz.com/2007/10/27/prince-record-label-go-crazy-over-dancing-baby/3
[14] http://www.blogherald.com/2007/10/08/copyright-cases-to-watch-lenz-v-universal/
[15] http://blog.wired.com/music/2007/07/eff-and-mom-sue.html
[16] http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9807555-7.html?tag=nefd.blgs
[17] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2007-08-15-Lenz%20v.%20Universal%20Amended%20Complaint.pdf
[18] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-04-08-Order%20on%20Universal%27s%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.pdf
[19] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-04-18-Lenz%27s%20Amended%20Complaint.pdf
[20] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/5-23-2008-Universal%20Music%27s%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss%20Second%20Amended%20Complaint.pdf
[21] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-06-20-Len%27s%20Opposition%20to%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss%20Second%20Amended%20Complaint.pdf
[22] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-07-03-Universal%27s%20Reply%20in%20Support%20of%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss%20Second%20Amended%20Complaint.pdf
[23] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-08-20-Lenz%20v.%20Universal%20-%20Order%20Denying%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.pdf
[24] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2010-02-15-Lenz%20v.%20Universal%20Order%20on%20Motion%20for%20Partial%20Summary%20Judgment.pdf