Digital Media Law Project
Published on Digital Media Law Project (https://www.dmlp.org)

Home > Viacom v. MoveOn.org and Brave New Films

Viacom v. MoveOn.org and Brave New Films [1]

Submitted by DMLP Staff on Wed, 02/13/2008 - 18:27

Summary

Threat Type: 

Correspondence

Date: 

03/13/2007

Status: 

Concluded

Disposition: 

Withdrawn

Location: 

California

Verdict or Settlement Amount: 

N/A

Legal Claims: 

Copyright Infringement
MoveOn.org, a progressive political organization, and Brave New Films, LLC, a politically oriented film company, created a video parodying Comedy Central's Colbert Report. The video, entitled "Stop the Falsiness," shows clips of the Colbert Report interspersed... read full description
Parties

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

MoveOn.org; Brave New Films, LLC

Type of Party: 

Large Organization
Media Company

Type of Party: 

Organization

Location of Party: 

  • New York
  • Delaware

Location of Party: 

  • California

Legal Counsel: 

Michael D. Fricklas (General Counsel of Viacom)

Legal Counsel: 

Fred von Lohmann, Lawrence Lessig, Anthony T. Falzone (MoveOn and Brave New Films)
Description

MoveOn.org [2], a progressive political organization, and Brave New Films, LLC, a politically oriented film company, created a video [3] parodying Comedy Central's Colbert Report [4]. The video, entitled "Stop the Falsiness," shows clips of the Colbert Report interspersed with tounge-in-cheek "commentary" from MoveOn activists and other political personalities, including liberal pundit Al Franken and Democratic sentator Russ Fiengold. MoveOn and Brave New Films uploaded the video to YouTube in August 2006. They also published it on a separate website, Stop the Falsiness [5].

On or about March 13, 2007, Viacom, the corporate parent of Comedy Central, delivered a takedown notice to YouTube pursuant to section 512(c) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act [6], apparentl asserting that "Stop the Falsiness" violated its copyright and requesting that it be taken down. (Although Viacom later disputed sending the takedown demand, a notice [7] appeared on YouTube on March 13, 2007 indicating that the video had been removed due to a copyright claim by Viacom, and Viacom ultimately relented.)

MoveOn and Brave New Films responded by suing Viacom under section 512(f) of the DMCA [6] for knowing, material misrepresentation of its claim of copyright infringement with regard to the video. The suit was based on the argument that the video was so clearly a fair use that Viacom could not have asserted in good faith that the clip infringed its copyright. Viacom responded with a letter [8] to the lawyers for MoveOn and Brave New Films, indicating that Viacom could not confirm sending the takedown notice and stating that Viacom had "no problem with your client's continued use of [the video] on its website or on YouTube."

That did not completely satisfy MoveOn and Brave New Films, and further negotiations took place between the lawyers. Eventually, Viacom agreed to adopt new policies enabling YouTube users to complain directly to Viacom about mistaken takedown notices and affirming the company's respect for fair use of its copyrighted materials. MoveOn and Brave New Films then dismissed the suit.

Related Links: 

Ars Technica: Viacom demands YouTube pull its videos down [9]

EFF Press Release: Free Speech Battle Over Online Parody of 'Colbert Report' [10]

Ars Technica: DMCA takedown backlash: EFF sues Viacom over Colbert parody clip [11]

San Francisco Chronicle: MoveOn.org files suit against Viacom over online video [12]

EFF Press Release: Viacom Admits Error -- Takes Steps to Protect Fair Use on YouTube [13]

Ars Technica: Viacom: We goofed on Colbert parody takedown notice; case dismissed [14]

EFF: MoveOn, Brave New Films v. Viacom [15]

Stop the Falsiness [5]

Details

Web Site(s) Involved: 

YouTube [16]

Content Type: 

  • Video

Publication Medium: 

Website

Subject Area: 

  • Copyright
  • Fair Use
  • DMCA
Court Information & Documents

Jurisdiction: 

  • California

Source of Law: 

  • United States

Court Name: 

United States District Court for the Northern District of California (lawsuit in response)

Court Type: 

Federal

Relevant Documents: 

PDF icon complaint.pdf [17]
PDF icon viacom_response_letter.pdf [18]
PDF icon 0411_letter_fvl.pdf [19]
PDF icon 0417_letter_fvl.pdf [20]

DMLP Logo


Source URL (modified on 08/20/2014 - 11:05pm): https://www.dmlp.org/threats/viacom-v-moveonorg-and-brave-new-films

Links
[1] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/viacom-v-moveonorg-and-brave-new-films
[2] https://www.dmlp.org/Moveon.org
[3] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNHqX27hlz8
[4] http://www.comedycentral.com/shows/the_colbert_report/index.jhtml
[5] http://falsiness.org/
[6] http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/512.html
[7] http://www.eff.org/files/filenode/moveon_v_viacom/screenshot_takedown.pdf
[8] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/viacom_response_letter.pdf
[9] http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070202-8756.html
[10] http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2007/03/free-speech-battle-over-online-parody-colbert-report
[11] http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070322-dmca-takedown-backlash-eff-sues-viacom-over-colbert-parody-clip.html
[12] http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/03/23/BUGBROQ9H31.DTL
[13] http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2007/04/viacom-admits-error-takes-steps-protect-fair-use-youtube
[14] http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070423-viacom-we-goofed-on-colbert-parody-takedown-notice-case-dismissed.html
[15] http://www.eff.org/cases/moveon-brave-new-films-v-viacom
[16] https://www.dmlp.org/Youtube.com
[17] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/complaint.pdf
[18] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/viacom_response_letter.pdf
[19] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/0411_letter_fvl.pdf
[20] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/0417_letter_fvl.pdf