Digital Media Law Project
Published on Digital Media Law Project (https://www.dmlp.org)

Home > Southern California Regional Rail Authority v. Arkow

Southern California Regional Rail Authority v. Arkow [1]

Submitted by DMLP Staff on Tue, 05/27/2008 - 10:36

Summary

Threat Type: 

Lawsuit

Date: 

03/19/2008

Status: 

Concluded

Disposition: 

Dismissed (total)

Location: 

California

Verdict or Settlement Amount: 

N/A

Legal Claims: 

Cybersquatting
In March 2008, the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA), which operates the regional commuter railway service in southern California known as Metrolink, filed an administrative complaint with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center against Robert Arkow pursuant to the ... read full description
Parties

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

Robert Arkow

Type of Party: 

Government

Type of Party: 

Individual

Location of Party: 

  • California

Location of Party: 

  • California

Legal Counsel: 

Raymond G. Fortner, Jr.; Truc M. Luu

Legal Counsel: 

Robert Arkow (Pro Se)
Description

In March 2008, the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (SCRRA), which operates the regional commuter railway service in southern California known as Metrolink, filed an administrative complaint with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center against Robert Arkow pursuant to the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) [2]. (The UDRP is a policy that website operators automatically agree to when they register a domain name; the policy enables trademark owners to initiate an administrative proceeding challenging the registration of a domain name in "bad faith.") Arkow, a self-styled consumer advocate, registered the domain name "metrolinkriders.com" in August 2006, in connection with a forum website he created to host rider discussion and commentary (much of it critical) about Metrolink train services and policies. After the SCRRA threatened Arkow with legal action [3], he also registered the domain name "metrolinksucks.com."

Arkow represented himself in the administrative proceeding and filed a response to the SCRRA complaint in April 2008. In May, the WIPO-appointed decision-maker, W. Scott Blackmer, dismissed the complaint against Arkow, finding that he had registered the two domain names for purposes of engaging in consumer commentary and criticism, and not in bad faith.

Related Links: 

LA Weekly: Metrolink Tries to Censor Bloggers [4]

CMLP: Southern California Regional Rail Authority v. Arkow (Letter) [3]

Details

Web Site(s) Involved: 

Metrolinkrider [5]

Metrolinksucks [6] (does not resolve)

Publication Medium: 

Forum

Subject Area: 

  • Trademark
Court Information & Documents

Jurisdiction: 

  • California

Court Name: 

World Intellectual Property Organization Arbitration and Mediation Center

Court Type: 

Administrative

Case Number: 

D2008-0430

Relevant Documents: 

PDF icon 2008-01-14-Metrolink Letter to Arkow.pdf [7]
PDF icon 2008-03-19-Metrolink Complaint.pdf [8]
PDF icon 2008-04-15-Arkow Response.pdf [9]
PDF icon 2008-04-15-Exhibits to Arkow Response.pdf [10]
PDF icon 2008-05-12-Metrolink Decision.pdf [11]

DMLP Logo


Source URL (modified on 08/20/2014 - 11:06pm): https://www.dmlp.org/threats/southern-california-regional-rail-authority-v-arkow

Links
[1] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/southern-california-regional-rail-authority-v-arkow
[2] http://www.icann.org/udrp/udrp-policy-24oct99.htm
[3] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/southern-california-regional-rail-authority-v-arkow-letter
[4] http://www.laweekly.com/news/news/metrolink-tries-to-censor-bloggers/18960/
[5] http://www.metrolinkrider.com/
[6] http://www.metrolinksucks.com/
[7] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-01-14-Metrolink%20Letter%20to%20Arkow.pdf
[8] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-03-19-Metrolink%20Complaint.pdf
[9] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-04-15-Arkow%20Response.pdf
[10] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-04-15-Exhibits%20to%20Arkow%20Response.pdf
[11] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-05-12-Metrolink%20Decision.pdf