Digital Media Law Project
Published on Digital Media Law Project (https://www.dmlp.org)

Home > Lavandeira v. Infuse, LLC

Lavandeira v. Infuse, LLC [1]

Submitted by DMLP Staff on Tue, 09/16/2008 - 00:07

Summary

Threat Type: 

Lawsuit

Date: 

07/21/2008

Status: 

Pending

Disposition: 

Default Judgment

Location: 

California

Verdict or Settlement Amount: 

N/A

Legal Claims: 

Cybersquatting
Trademark Infringement
Trademark Dilution
Unfair Competition
Celebrity gossip blogger Mario Lavandeira (aka Perez Hilton), who operates the blog perezhilton.com, sued Infuse LLC, Margie E. Rogers and Elizabeth Silver-Fagan, the owner, editor and publisher, respectively, of a rival celebrity blog named PerezRevenge.com, which describes itself as a... read full description
Parties

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

Infuse, LLC; Margie Rogers; Elizabeth Silver-Fagan; Does 1-10

Type of Party: 

Individual

Type of Party: 

Individual
Organization

Location of Party: 

  • California

Location of Party: 

  • California
  • New Jersey

Legal Counsel: 

Bryan J Freedman, Jesse A Kaplan - Freedman and Taitelman LLP

Legal Counsel: 

Pro se
Description

Celebrity gossip blogger Mario Lavandeira (aka Perez Hilton), who operates the blog perezhilton.com [2], sued Infuse LLC, Margie E. Rogers and Elizabeth Silver-Fagan, the owner, editor and publisher, respectively, of a rival celebrity blog named PerezRevenge.com, which describes itself as a "website where celebrities could post information about their careers, events and when necessary personal lives without the taint of rumor or speculation." Hilton's complaint [3] asserts that their use of the name PerezRevenge is a violation of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, as well as unfair competition, federal dilution of trademark, and unfair trade practices.

Hilton seeks injunctive relief and treble damages.

On July 22, 2008, one day after Lavandiera filed his lawsuit, defendant Silver, the publisher of PerezRevenge.com, filed a breach of contract lawsuit against Lavandiera in New York. See the related lawsuit, Silver v. Lavandiera [4].

UPDATE:

05/06/09 - The court, after awarding a default judgment for Hilton, enjoined Infuse [5] from "using the domain name perezhilton.com... [or] using the term 'Perez' to designate any platform...that contains entertainment or celebrity news or gossip."  Silver's site now resides at www.rPulse.com [6].

Related Links: 

  • Los Angeles Times: Perez Hilton sues Perezrevenge.com for cyber-squatting [7]
  • Huffington Post: Perez Hilton Sues PerezRevenge.com Team For Cyber-Squatting [8]
  • Entertainment and Media Law Blog: PerezRevenge: Is Perez Hilton the Victim of a Reverse Domain Hijacking? [9]
  • THR: Perez Hilton wins judgment against PerezRevenge site [10]
Details

Web Site(s) Involved: 

PerezRevenge.com [11]

perezhilton.com [2]

www.rPulse.com [6]

 

[11]

Content Type: 

  • Video
  • Photo
  • Text

Publication Medium: 

Blog

Subject Area: 

  • Trademark
Court Information & Documents

Jurisdiction: 

  • California

Source of Law: 

  • United States

Court Name: 

United States District Court for the Central District of California

Court Type: 

Federal

Case Number: 

2:08-cv-04764

Relevant Documents: 

PDF icon 2008-07-21-Lavandiera Complaint.pdf [12]
PDF icon Lavandeira.Default.Motion.pdf [13]
PDF icon Lavandeira.Default.2.pdf [14]
PDF icon Lavandeira.Default.3.pdf [15]
PDF icon Lavandeira.Jt.Motion.DismissPJ.pdf [16]
PDF icon Lavandeira.Obj.to.MtDismiss.pdf [17]
PDF icon Lavandeira.Opp.to.MtDismiss.pdf [18]
PDF icon Lavandeira.Dismissal1.pdf [19]
PDF icon Lavandeira.Dismissal2.pdf [20]
PDF icon Lavandeira.Default.Motion.Infuse.pdf [21]
PDF icon Lavandeira.AttysFees.pdf [22]
PDF icon Lavandeira.opp.final.pdf [23]
PDF icon 2009-05-06-Hilton Judgment.pdf [24]
CMLP Information (Private)

Priority: 

2-Normal

Threat Source: 

MLRC

CMLP Notes: 

Updated 2/19/2009 - VAF

Updated 6/25/2009 - AVM added enjoining order

DMLP Logo


Source URL (modified on 08/20/2014 - 11:07pm): https://www.dmlp.org/threats/lavandeira-v-infuse-llc

Links
[1] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/lavandeira-v-infuse-llc
[2] http://www.perezhilton.com/
[3] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-07-21-Lavandiera%20Complaint.pdf
[4] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/silver-v-lavandeira
[5] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-05-06-Hilton%20Judgment.pdf
[6] http://www.rPulse.com
[7] http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2008/07/perez-hilton-su.html
[8] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/07/23/perez-hilton-sues-perezre_n_114551.html
[9] http://reporter.blogs.com/thresq/2008/07/perez-hilton-su.html
[10] http://reporter.blogs.com/thresq/2009/05/perez-hilton-lawsuit-win-perezrevenge.html
[11] http://www.perezrevenge.com
[12] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-07-21-Lavandiera%20Complaint.pdf
[13] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/Lavandeira.Default.Motion.pdf
[14] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/Lavandeira.Default.2.pdf
[15] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/Lavandeira.Default.3.pdf
[16] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/Lavandeira.Jt.Motion.DismissPJ.pdf
[17] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/Lavandeira.Obj.to.MtDismiss.pdf
[18] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/Lavandeira.Opp.to.MtDismiss.pdf
[19] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/Lavandeira.Dismissal1.pdf
[20] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/Lavandeira.Dismissal2.pdf
[21] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/Lavandeira.Default.Motion.Infuse.pdf
[22] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/Lavandeira.AttysFees.pdf
[23] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/Lavandeira.opp.final.pdf
[24] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-05-06-Hilton%20Judgment.pdf