Digital Media Law Project
Published on Digital Media Law Project (https://www.dmlp.org)

Home > The Traditional Cat Association v. Gilbreath

The Traditional Cat Association v. Gilbreath [1]

Submitted by DMLP Staff on Tue, 03/24/2009 - 16:13

Summary

Threat Type: 

Lawsuit

Date: 

05/22/2002

Status: 

Concluded

Disposition: 

Dismissed (partial)
Material Removed
Settled (total)

Location: 

California

Verdict or Settlement Amount: 

N/A

Legal Claims: 

Conversion
Defamation
Unfair Competition
On May 22, 2002, Diane Fineran and The Traditional Cat Association (TTCA), filed a lawsuit against Laura Gilbreath, Lee Zimmerman, Randi Briggs, John Herold, Diane Dunaway, and Traditional Cat Association (TCA), claiming unfair competition, defamation, and conversion.  The individuals in this case are all cat... read full description
Parties

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

Laura Gilbreath; Lee Zimerman; Randi Briggs; John Herold; Diane Dunaway; Traditional Cat Association

Type of Party: 

Individual
Organization

Type of Party: 

Individual
Organization

Location of Party: 

  • Washington

Location of Party: 

  • California
  • Maryland

Legal Counsel: 

Jerry D. Hemme, James W. Peterson

Legal Counsel: 

Darren J. Quinn (for Defendants Gilbreath, Zimmerman, Briggs, Herold, and Traditional Cat Association, Inc.); Anthony J. Passante Jr. (for Defendant Dunaway)
Description

On May 22, 2002, Diane Fineran and The Traditional Cat Association (TTCA), filed a lawsuit against Laura Gilbreath, Lee Zimmerman, Randi Briggs, John Herold, Diane Dunaway, and Traditional Cat Association (TCA), claiming unfair competition, defamation, and conversion. 

The individuals in this case are all cat enthusiasts who held leadership positions in defendant organization TCA.  In 1998, a dispute led Fineran to leave TCA and found her own organization, TTCA.  Fineran then commenced a series of lawsuits against the defendants related to the dispute and her departure.  In response to these lawsuits, in 1998 defendant Herold created a website named "The Diane Fineran Response Web Site," which purported to report the status of this litigation. 

On May 22, 2002, Fineran filed suit again, claiming that Herold's website was defamatory, and also claiming unfair competition and conversion.  According to her complaint, Herold's website falsely stated that a jury had found Fineran guilty of defamation, and falsely stated that she had admitted that she did not found TCA.  According to the complaint, the website also stated that Fineran uses "intimidation" tactics, is a "dictator," and engages in "misrepresentations," "half truths" and "whole cloth invention."

The defendants moved to strike the complaint under California's anti-SLAPP statute [2].  The Superior Court denied the motion, finding that a statute of limitations defense will not support relief under the anti-SLAPP statute.  The California Court of Appeals for the Fourth District, Division One reversed the lower court and dismissed the defamation claim.  The court rejected the plaintiffs' argument that the statute of limitations renewed continuously as long as the website was running, applying California's single-publication rule [3] to websites.  The appellate court found that the defendants had not unambiguously challenged the unfair competition claim in their motion to strike, so this claim remained intact.

In January, 2005, the parties settled.  Plaintiffs Fineran and TTCA agreed to pay $24,647.28 in attorney's fees and costs to the defendants.  Defendant organization TCA, now known as Traditional and Classic Cat International, agreed to change their numbering system for registering cats and kittens to be dissimilar from TTCA.  "The Diane Fineran Response Web Site" is no longer available.

Related Links: 

  • The Traditional Cat Association Official Website: The Traditional Cat Association: TCA, Inc. vs TACCI [4]
Details

Web Site(s) Involved: 

The Diane Fineran Response Web Site (defunct)

Content Type: 

  • Text

Publication Medium: 

Website

Subject Area: 

  • Defamation
  • SLAPP
  • Statute of Limitations
Court Information & Documents

Jurisdiction: 

  • California

Source of Law: 

  • California

Court Name: 

Superior Court for the State of California for the County of San Diego; California Court of Appeal for the Fourth District, Division One

Court Type: 

State

Case Number: 

GIC789066 (superior); D041421 (appellate)

Relevant Documents: 

PDF icon 2004-05-06-Traditional Cat v. Gilbreath Appellate Opinion.pdf [5]
PDF icon Traditional Cat v. Gilbreath Proposed Settlement Agreement.pdf [6]
PDF icon First Amended Complain nov 20 02 cats.pdf [7]
PDF icon Cat plaintiff cease and desist letter march 13 01.pdf [8]
CMLP Information (Private)

Priority: 

1-High

CMLP Notes: 

Source:mentioned in case on westlaw

DMLP Logo


Source URL (modified on 08/20/2014 - 11:08pm): https://www.dmlp.org/threats/traditional-cat-association-v-gilbreath

Links
[1] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/traditional-cat-association-v-gilbreath
[2] https://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/anti-slapp-law-california
[3] https://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/statute-limitations#singlePubRule
[4] http://www.legal.traditionalcats.com/
[5] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2004-05-06-Traditional%20Cat%20v.%20Gilbreath%20Appellate%20Opinion.pdf
[6] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/Traditional%20Cat%20v.%20Gilbreath%20Proposed%20Settlement%20Agreement.pdf
[7] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/First%20Amended%20Complain%20nov%2020%2002%20cats.pdf
[8] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/Cat%20plaintiff%20cease%20and%20desist%20letter%20march%2013%2001.pdf