Digital Media Law Project
Published on Digital Media Law Project (https://www.dmlp.org)

Home > Virgin America v. Adrants Publishing

Virgin America v. Adrants Publishing [1]

Submitted by DMLP Staff on Thu, 01/29/2009 - 17:56

Summary

Threat Type: 

Lawsuit

Date: 

01/26/2009

Status: 

Pending

Disposition: 

Material Removed

Location: 

California

Verdict or Settlement Amount: 

N/A

Legal Claims: 

Defamation
False Advertising
Trademark Infringement
Trademark Dilution
California-based airline Virgin America filed a six-count complaint against the publisher and editors of Adrants, a blog focused on the advertising industry, after it published a post that was paired with a fake ad containing the Virgin logo... read full description
Parties

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

Adrants Publishing, LLC; Steve Hall; Angela Natividad; Nina Aldredge

Type of Party: 

Organization

Type of Party: 

Individual
Organization

Location of Party: 

  • California
  • Delaware

Location of Party: 

  • California
  • New York
  • Massachusetts

Legal Counsel: 

Rodger R. Cole, Mashhood Rassam - Fenwick & West LLP
Description

California-based airline Virgin America filed a six-count complaint against the publisher and editors of Adrants [2], a blog focused on the advertising industry, after it published a post [3] that was paired with a fake ad containing the Virgin logo and the statement, "The Hudson Crash: Just One More Reason to Fly Virgin."  The post has since been removed, but a cached version is available here [4].

Virgin filed its complaint [5] on January 26, 2009, alleging:

The advertisement consisted of a photograph of the crash of US Airways flight 1549 from January 15, 2009 depicted under the heading “The Hudson Crash: Just One More Reason to Fly Virgin." The posting had an express assertion by Adrants Co-Editor Natividad about the apparent validity of the Virgin America advertisement. However, the depicted photograph was not a Virgin America advertisement and the advertisement was in no way sponsored by or affiliated with Virgin America. Defendants’ posting of the false advertisement on the Adrants.com website was likely to cause consumer confusion as to source, affiliation or sponsorship; was likely to and tended to dilute and tarnish the distinctive nature of and reputation ascribed to Virgin America’s famous name and trademark; and was likely to generate the false belief among consumers that Virgin America had sponsored, endorsed, was affiliated with, and supported Defendants and Adrants.com. 

Virgin's lawsuit asserts claims for trademark and trade name infringement, false designation of origin and false and deceptive advertising, trademark dilution, false and misleading statements, and defamation.

According to press accounts [6]:

In response to a Virgin America email demanding that the picture be removed, Angela Natividad, a head honcho at Adrants, added this copy above the original post: "UPDATE: Clearly, this ad is fake. A spoof. Virgin America has confirmed this. We were always supect from the get go and didn't mean to mislead or misrepresent. So we'll clearly state now: the ad is a spoof. It's not real. Virgin America had nothing to do with its creation."

Related Links: 

  • Agency Spy: Adrants Gets Sued By Virgin America [6]
  • Gawker: Virgin Sues Blogger Over Fake Ad, Gives Fake Ad Massive Exposure [7]
  • AdFreak.com: Virgin sues Adrants for posting a parody ad [8]
  • AdWeek: Virgin Faces Uphill Battle v. Adrants, per Experts [9]
  • CMLP Blog: Breaking News: Virgin America Sues Blog Over Parody Ad [10]
Details

Web Site(s) Involved: 

Adrants [2]

Content Type: 

  • Photo

Publication Medium: 

Blog

Subject Area: 

  • Defamation
  • Trademark
  • Advertising
Court Information & Documents

Jurisdiction: 

  • California

Source of Law: 

  • United States
  • California

Court Name: 

United States District Court for the Northern District of California

Court Type: 

Federal

Case Number: 

3:09-cv-00337-BZ

Relevant Documents: 

PDF icon 2009-01-26-Virgin America Complaint.pdf [11]

DMLP Logo


Source URL (modified on 08/20/2014 - 11:08pm): https://www.dmlp.org/threats/virgin-america-v-adrants-publishing

Links
[1] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/virgin-america-v-adrants-publishing
[2] http://adrants.com/
[3] http://www.adrants.com/2009/01/the-hudson-crash-just-one-more-reason.php
[4] http://209.85.173.132/search?q=cache:WwWaJgbvcyQJ:www.adrants.com/2009/01/15/+%22The+Hudson+Crash:+Just+One+More+Reason+to+Fly+Virgin%22&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=7&gl=us&client=firefox-a
[5] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-01-26-Virgin%20America%20Complaint.pdf
[6] http://www.mediabistro.com/agencyspy/brands/adrants_gets_sued_by_virgin_america_107093.asp
[7] http://gawker.com/5141376/virgin-sues-blogger-over-fake-ad-gives-fake-ad-massive-exposure
[8] http://adweek.blogs.com/adfreak/2009/01/virgin-sues-adrants-for-posting-a-parody-ad.html
[9] http://www.adweek.com/aw/content_display/news/media/e3iabb39aac80c6a2782af80ae3af69a0b0
[10] https://www.dmlp.org/blog/2009/breaking-news-virgin-america-sues-blog-over-parody-ad
[11] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-01-26-Virgin%20America%20Complaint.pdf