Digital Media Law Project
Published on Digital Media Law Project (https://www.dmlp.org)

Home > Mitan v. Davis

Mitan v. Davis [1]

Submitted by DMLP Staff on Fri, 03/27/2009 - 16:30

Summary

Threat Type: 

Lawsuit

Date: 

02/20/2008

Status: 

Pending

Disposition: 

Dismissed (partial)

Location: 

Kentucky

Verdict or Settlement Amount: 

N/A

Legal Claims: 

Defamation
On February 20th, 2008, the Mitans filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky against eight individuals located throughout the U.S. and Vitramax Group, Inc., alleging libel and slander.  The Mitans' complaint claims that Emory and Carol... read full description
Parties

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

Emory Davis; Carol Davis; Vitramax Group, Inc.; Ronald Rash; Achim Neumann; Dwight McNeil; Craig Cullinane; Linda Cullinane; Thomas F. Cullinane, Jr.

Type of Party: 

Individual

Type of Party: 

Individual
Organization

Location of Party: 

  • Michigan

Location of Party: 

  • New Jersey
  • Virginia
  • Missouri
  • Kentucky

Legal Counsel: 

Bruce D. Atherton - Bruce D. Atherton & Associates, PLLC (withdrawn)

Legal Counsel: 

J. Fox DeMoisey and Jonathan E. Breitenstein - DeMoisey Law Office, PLLC (for Emory M. Davis, Carol C. Davis, and Vitramax Group, Inc.); Sandra Finley Keene (for Ronald Rash); Louis Barbone - Jacobs & Barbone (for Linda, Thomas & Craig Cullinane)
Description

On February 20th, 2008, the Mitans filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky against eight individuals located throughout the U.S. and Vitramax Group, Inc., alleging libel and slander.  The Mitans' complaint claims that Emory and Carol Davis created a website called the "Mitan Alert" in October of 1999, and that a U.S. Bankruptcy Court previously found the website to be defamatory and ordered them "to cease and desist publication of the website, to remove it from viewing on the Internet, and never to publish the website again." 

The complaint further alleges that the Davises sent printed pages of the website to the other defendants via fascimile, and that the other defendants then transmitted those printed pages to third parties.  The Mitans do not identify any specific allegedly defamatory statements, but allege that the web pages "tend to prejudice [them] in their trade, calling and/or profession since the information damages [their] reputation for honesty, integrity, and morality."

Ronald Rash, Achim Neumann, Craig Cullinane, Linda Cullinane, and Thomas F. Cullinane, Jr., submitted motions to dismiss the complaint based on lack of personal jurisdiction. The Cullinanes also argued [2] that section 230 of the Communications Decency Act [3] barred the claims against them because the Mitans only alleged that they "received, faxed or discussed or discussed the content of a website that [they] did not author, edit or create."

The court granted the motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, finding that Rash, Neumann, and the Cullinanes did not have sufficient minimum contacts with Kentucky.  The court rejected the Mitans' argument that receiving information from Kentucky was sufficient to confer jurisdiction.  The court did not reach the Cullinanes' section 230 argument.

The case is ongoing against Carol and Emory Davis and Vitramax. They filed an answer and counterclaims alleging abuse of process in June 2008.

Details

Web Site(s) Involved: 

Mitan Alert (defunct)

Content Type: 

  • Text

Publication Medium: 

Print
Website

Subject Area: 

  • Defamation
  • Section 230
  • Personal Jurisdiction
  • Prior Restraints
Court Information & Documents

Jurisdiction: 

  • Kentucky

Source of Law: 

  • Kentucky

Court Name: 

United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky

Court Type: 

Federal

Case Number: 

3:08-CV-117-S

Relevant Documents: 

PDF icon 2008-02-20-Mitan v. Davis Complaint.pdf [4]
PDF icon 2008-04-25-Cullinane Memo in Support of Motion to Dismiss.pdf [5]
PDF icon 2008-04-25-Cullinane Motion to Dismiss.pdf [6]
PDF icon 2008-04-28-Mitan's Response to Neumann's Motion to Dismiss.pdf [7]
PDF icon 2008-04-28-Mitan's Response to Rash's Motion to Dismiss.pdf [8]
PDF icon 2008-05-12-Reply of Rash to Mitan's Response to Motion to Dismiss.pdf [9]
PDF icon 2008-05-15-Mitan's Response to Cullinane Motion to Dismiss.pdf [10]
PDF icon 2008-05-16-Neumann's Reply to Mitan's Respose to Motion to Dismiss.pdf [11]
PDF icon 2008-06-11-Davis' and Vitramax Answer and Counterclaims.pdf [12]
PDF icon 2008-06-17-Mitan v. Davis Plaintiffs' Answer to Counterclaim.pdf [13]
PDF icon 2008-06-24-Davis' and Vitramax Response to Motion to Withdrawal as Counsel.pdf [14]
PDF icon 2008-07-03-Keith Mitan's Response in Objection to Motion to Withdrawal as Counsel.pdf [15]
PDF icon 2008-12-15-Memo Opinion and Order Rash-Neumann-Cullinanes Motion to Dismiss.pdf [16]
PDF icon 2009-03-11-Order for Motion to Withdrawal as Counsel.pdf [17]
PDF icon 2008-03-31-Memo in Support of Rash Motion to Dismiss.pdf [18]
PDF icon 2008-03-31-Neumann Motion to Dismiss.pdf [19]
PDF icon 2008-03-31-Rash Motion to Dismiss.pdf [20]
CMLP Information (Private)

Priority: 

1-High

Threat Source: 

Westlaw Alert

CMLP Notes: 

The complaint notes that "Mitan Alert" previously was found to be defamatory in U.S. Bankruptcy Court.  Whoever edits this entry should hunt down that case and add it as an additional threat entry.  {MCS}

 

RP--I have a ton of docs to up load next week.

Mitan
v. Davis
Slip
Copy, 2008 WL 5233188
W.D.Ky.,2008.
December 15, 2008 (Approx. 1 page)

In re
Davis
347 B.R.
607
W.D.Ky.,2006.
August 14, 2006 (Approx. 10 pages)

In re
Davis
334 B.R.
874
Bkrtcy.W.D.Ky.,2005.
December 07, 2005 (Approx. 20
pages)

Mitan
v. Davis
243
F.Supp.2d 719
W.D.Ky.,2003.
February 03, 2003 (Approx. 5 pages)

In re
Emory M DAVIS, Carol C Davis, Debtor(s).
2003 WL
25759801
United
States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky.
Trial Filing (Approx. 2 pages)

In re
Mitan
178
Fed.Appx. 503
C.A.6 (Mich.),2006.
April 27, 2006 (Approx. 6
pages)

In re
Mitan
371 B.R.
244
E.D.Mich.,2007.
June 04, 2007 (Approx. 5 pages)

U.S.
v. Mitan
Slip
Copy, 2009 WL 604695
E.D.Pa.,2009.
March 06, 2009 (Approx. 10 pages)

 

DMLP Logo


Source URL (modified on 08/20/2014 - 11:08pm): https://www.dmlp.org/threats/mitan-v-davis

Links
[1] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/mitan-v-davis
[2] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-04-25-Cullinane%20Memo%20in%20Support%20of%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.pdf
[3] http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode47/usc_sec_47_00000230----000-.html
[4] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-02-20-Mitan%20v.%20Davis%20Complaint.pdf
[5] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-04-25-Cullinane%20Memo%20in%20Support%20of%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.pdf
[6] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-04-25-Cullinane%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.pdf
[7] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-04-28-Mitan%27s%20Response%20to%20Neumann%27s%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.pdf
[8] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-04-28-Mitan%27s%20Response%20to%20Rash%27s%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.pdf
[9] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-05-12-Reply%20of%20Rash%20to%20Mitan%27s%20Response%20to%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.pdf
[10] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-05-15-Mitan%27s%20Response%20to%20Cullinane%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.pdf
[11] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-05-16-Neumann%27s%20Reply%20to%20Mitan%27s%20Respose%20to%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.pdf
[12] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-06-11-Davis%27%20and%20Vitramax%20Answer%20and%20Counterclaims_0.pdf
[13] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-06-17-Mitan%20v.%20Davis%20Plaintiffs%27%20Answer%20to%20Counterclaim_0.pdf
[14] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-06-24-Davis%27%20and%20Vitramax%20Response%20to%20Motion%20to%20Withdrawal%20as%20Counsel.pdf
[15] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-07-03-Keith%20Mitan%27s%20Response%20in%20Objection%20to%20Motion%20to%20Withdrawal%20as%20Counsel.pdf
[16] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-12-15-Memo%20Opinion%20and%20Order%20Rash-Neumann-Cullinanes%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.pdf
[17] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-03-11-Order%20for%20Motion%20to%20Withdrawal%20as%20Counsel.pdf
[18] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-03-31-Memo%20in%20Support%20of%20Rash%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.pdf
[19] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-03-31-Neumann%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.pdf
[20] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-03-31-Rash%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.pdf