Digital Media Law Project
Published on Digital Media Law Project (https://www.dmlp.org)

Home > Suarez v. Mecca

Suarez v. Mecca [1]

Submitted by DMLP Staff on Fri, 06/19/2009 - 09:44

Summary

Threat Type: 

Lawsuit

Date: 

08/09/2005

Status: 

Pending

Disposition: 

Dismissed (partial)

Location: 

New Jersey

Verdict or Settlement Amount: 

N/A

Legal Claims: 

Defamation
In August 2005, Ridgefield New Jersey mayor Anthony R. Suarez sued Ridgefield resident Michael Mecca, who had allegedly posted defamatory content to the Ridgefield forum on NJ.com under the alias "Voter12345."  According to court filings, the... read full description
Parties

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

NJ.com; PITA01; MRCH0133; Voter 12345 a/k/a Michael Mecca

Type of Party: 

Individual

Type of Party: 

Individual
Intermediary

Location of Party: 

  • New Jersey

Location of Party: 

  • New Jersey

Legal Counsel: 

Andrew T. Fede - Herten, Burstein, Sheridan, Cevasco, Bottinelli, Litt & Harz, L.L.C.

Legal Counsel: 

Steven Siegel - Sokol, Behot and Fiorenzo
Description

In August 2005, Ridgefield [2] New Jersey mayor Anthony R. Suarez sued Ridgefield resident Michael Mecca, who had allegedly posted defamatory content to the Ridgefield forum [3] on NJ.com [4] under the alias "Voter12345."  According to court filings, the allegedly defamatory content indicated that the mayor took part in a politically motivated raid on Mecca's house and was present when police showed up at the door to investigate an anonymous tip that he had an illegal apartment.  (App. Ct. Op. [5] 2.)  At a deposition, however, Mecca admitted that the incident had been relayed to him by his friend, Ridgefield municipal prosecutor Marc Ramundo, and had not actually occurred in front of either Mecca or Ramundo.  According to the Appellate Court opinion [5], Mecca believed that the story was true.  (App. Ct. Op. 3.)

The trial court [6] granted summary judgment to Mecca, finding that Suarez had "failed to show any harm to his reputation, or damages, resulting from the claimed defamatory conduct."  (App. Ct. Op. 2.)  Upon appeal, the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division, affirmed the trial court's ruling, upholding the grant of summary judgment for Mecca. 

According to NorthJersey.com [7], Mecca has filed a malicious prosecution suit against Suarez.  The jury in that case found [7], however, that Suarez's defamation suit was not malicious.  

Related Links: 

  • NorthJersey.com: Jury: Mayor's suit not malicious [7]
  • NorthJersey.com: Police chief sues over online posts [8]  (brief mention near the end of the page)
    Details

    Web Site(s) Involved: 

    NJ.com forums
    [9]

    Content Type: 

    • Text

    Publication Medium: 

    Forum

    Subject Area: 

    • Defamation
    • User Comments or Submissions
    Court Information & Documents

    Jurisdiction: 

    • New Jersey

    Source of Law: 

    • New Jersey

    Court Name: 

    Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County

    Court Type: 

    State

    Case Number: 

    Trial court: L-5546-05; Appellate court: A-0229-07T1

    Relevant Documents: 

    Microsoft Office document icon 2008-06-27-Appellate Court Opinion.doc [10]
    CMLP Information (Private)

    Priority: 

    1-High

    CMLP Notes: 

    Source: North Jersey.com

    Note that the threat is the defamation lawsuit, not the malicious prosecution suit filed as a result of the defamation suit.

    What is status of remaining defendants???

    DMLP Logo


    Source URL (modified on 08/20/2014 - 11:09pm): https://www.dmlp.org/threats/suarez-v-mecca

    Links
    [1] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/suarez-v-mecca
    [2] http://ridgefieldboro.org/
    [3] http://www.nj.com/forums/ridgefield/
    [4] http://www.nj.com/
    [5] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-06-27-Appellate%20Court%20Opinion.doc
    [6] http://www.judiciary.state.nj.us/bergen/index.htm
    [7] http://www.northjersey.com/news/crimeandcourts/41355717.html
    [8] http://www.northjersey.com/politics/40832107.html
    [9] http://www.nj.com/forums/
    [10] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-06-27-Appellate%20Court%20Opinion.doc