Digital Media Law Project
Published on Digital Media Law Project (https://www.dmlp.org)

Home > Bible & Gospel Trust v. Twinam

Bible & Gospel Trust v. Twinam [1]

Submitted by DMLP Staff on Fri, 06/26/2009 - 14:28

Summary

Threat Type: 

Lawsuit

Date: 

01/25/2007

Status: 

Pending

Location: 

Vermont

Verdict or Settlement Amount: 

N/A

Legal Claims: 

Conversion
Copyright Infringement
Tortious Interference
Bible & Gospel Trust, associated with a religious group known as the Exclusive Brethren, sued Sallie and Timothy Twinam claiming that they were the owners and operators of the website Peebs.net, which is critical of the Exclusive Brethren.... read full description
Parties

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

Timothy J. Twinam; Sallie Twinam; Peebs.net

Type of Party: 

Organization

Type of Party: 

Individual

Location of Party: 

  • United Kingdom

Location of Party: 

  • Vermont

Legal Counsel: 

Kathleen Walls - Glinka & Walls; Matthew H. Kirtland, Ashley E. Seuell - Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P.

Legal Counsel: 

Rebecca E. Boucher, Ronald A. Shems - Shems Dunkiel Kassel & Saunders, PLLC (for Defendant Timothy Twinam); Pro se (Defendant Sallie Twinam)
Description

Bible & Gospel Trust, associated with a religious group known as the Exclusive Brethren, sued Sallie and Timothy Twinam claiming that they were the owners and operators of the website Peebs.ne [2]t [2], which is critical of the Exclusive Brethren.  

The complaint [3], which includes claims of copyright infringement, conversion, and tortious interference with a contractual relationship, arises from the alleged posting of materials from the Exclusive Brethren's now-defunct website, exclusivebrethren.net.  Bible & Gospel Trust claims that all interests in exclusivebrethren.net and its contents were transferred to it as part of a settlement agreement in an earlier case [4], and that the unauthorized posting of the material on Peebs.net constitutes a violation of Bible & Gospel Trust’s copyrights.  

Although Timothy Twinam denied being the owner of Peebs.net in his answer [5], he later admitted to owning the site during discovery, according to a Peebs.net press release [6].  Sallie Twinam admits [7] to having been a “nominal owner” of the site only for the period of time between April 5, 2007 and January 25, 2008.  Both deny that the alleged copyrighted material was published on Peebs.net.  

Bible & Gospel Trust is seeking an injunction preventing the publication of its copyrighted material, an order compelling Twinam and Peebs.net to destroy all copies of the copyrighted material in their possession and to publish a retraction and an apology, and compensatory and punitive damages.

Timothy Twinam has filed a special motion to strike [8] under Vermont's Anti-SLAPP statute (12 V.S.A. § 1041 [9]).  The court is treating this motion as a motion for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 [10], but has yet to rule on this motion. 

Related Links: 

  • Peebs.net:Exclusive brethren battle peebsnet in vermont usa [11]
  • Religion News Blog: Cultic Exclusive Brethren sect pursues critic in court [12]
  • Peebs.net: Exclusive Brethren Force Identity Disclosure From Anonymous Web Site Owner [6]
Details

Web Site(s) Involved: 

www.peebs.net [13]

Content Type: 

  • Text

Publication Medium: 

Website

Subject Area: 

  • Copyright
  • SLAPP
  • Anonymity
  • Gripe Sites
Court Information & Documents

Jurisdiction: 

  • Vermont

Source of Law: 

  • United States
  • Vermont

Court Name: 

U.S. District Court for the District of Vermont

Court Type: 

Federal

Case Number: 

1:07-cv-00017

Relevant Documents: 

PDF icon 2008-03-31-First Amended Complaint .pdf [14]
PDF icon 2007-04-11-Timothy Twinam Answer.pdf [15]
PDF icon 2008-06-24-Sallie Twinam Answer.pdf [16]
PDF icon 2007-11-06-Timothy Twinam Further Answer.pdf [17]
PDF icon 2008-03-06-Special Motion to Strike.pdf [18]
PDF icon 2008-04-11-Response to Special Motion to Strike.pdf [19]
PDF icon 2008-05-02-Reply to Response to Special Motion to Strike.pdf [20]
PDF icon 2008-12-12-Court Initial Order on Special Motion to Strike.pdf [21]
CMLP Information (Private)

Priority: 

1-High

CMLP Notes: 

This is the same organization in Bible Gospel Trust v. Wyman

Some of the docs for this are on WL at 2009 WL 1707523

06/25/09 - LB editing

DMLP Logo


Source URL (modified on 08/20/2014 - 11:09pm): https://www.dmlp.org/threats/bible-gospel-trust-v-twinam

Links
[1] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/bible-gospel-trust-v-twinam
[2] http://peebs.net/
[3] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-03-31-First%20Amended%20Complaint%20.pdf
[4] http://blog.internetcases.com/2005/02/04/minnesota-federal-court-declines-to-exercise-personal-jurisdiction-over-winnipeg-website-operator/
[5] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2007-04-11-Timothy%20Twinam%20Answer.pdf
[6] http://peebs.net/ExclusiveBrethrenNews/Press/PR-20080220.html
[7] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-06-24-Sallie%20Twinam%20Answer.pdf
[8] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-03-06-Special%20Motion%20to%20Strike.pdf
[9] http://www.casp.net/statutes/vt-stat(2006).html
[10] http://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/Rule56.htm
[11] http://peebs.net/blog/2009/04/exclusive-brethren-battle-peebsnet-in-vermont-usa/
[12] http://www.religionnewsblog.com/23392/exclusive-brethren-cult-3
[13] http://www.peebs.net/
[14] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-03-31-First%20Amended%20Complaint%20.pdf
[15] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2007-04-11-Timothy%20Twinam%20Answer.pdf
[16] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-06-24-Sallie%20Twinam%20Answer.pdf
[17] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2007-11-06-Timothy%20Twinam%20Further%20Answer.pdf
[18] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-03-06-Special%20Motion%20to%20Strike.pdf
[19] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-04-11-Response%20to%20Special%20Motion%20to%20Strike.pdf
[20] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-05-02-Reply%20to%20Response%20to%20Special%20Motion%20to%20Strike.pdf
[21] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-12-12-Court%20Initial%20Order%20on%20Special%20Motion%20to%20Strike.pdf