Digital Media Law Project
Published on Digital Media Law Project (https://www.dmlp.org)

Home > Dolan v. Cityfile

Dolan v. Cityfile [1]

Submitted by DMLP Staff on Wed, 10/21/2009 - 19:05

Summary

Threat Type: 

Lawsuit

Date: 

07/27/2009

Status: 

Concluded

Disposition: 

Retraction Issued

Location: 

New York

Verdict or Settlement Amount: 

N/A

Legal Claims: 

Defamation
James Dolan, Cablevision Systems Corporation, and Madison Square Garden sued the blog Cityfile: New York, its publisher, and one of its bloggers over a July 2009 post entitled "Jim Dolan to Kill Christmas in July?"  The complaint (¶... read full description
Parties

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

Cityfile, Inc.; Remy Sterm; Teri Buhl

Type of Party: 

Individual
Large Organization

Type of Party: 

Individual
Organization

Location of Party: 

  • New York

Location of Party: 

  • New York
  • Delaware

Legal Counsel: 

Abigail M. Diaz-Pedrosa - Kirkland & Ellis LLP
Description

James Dolan, Cablevision Systems Corporation, and Madison Square Garden sued the blog Cityfile: New York [2], its publisher, and one of its bloggers over a July 2009 post entitled "Jim Dolan to Kill Christmas in July?"  The complaint [3] (¶ 1), filed in New York state court, describes the Cityfile post as follows:

The article . . . defames and disparages the Radio City Christmas Spectacular, the iconic holiday season production owned and operated by MSG, by — among other things — falsely alleging that Plaintiffs plan to "kill Christmas" for millions of fans by discontinuing the Christmas Spectacular, "scrap[ping]" the world-famous Rockettes, and installing an entirely new show at Radio City Music Hall during the holiday season.  Although the article purports to cite "insiders" as the source for these inflammatory allegations, the article is, in truth, nothing more than a sensational headline based on unfounded speculation, including double-hearsay from a "former cast member" and other anonymous "sources" who, as Defendant knew or should have known, have no knowledge of Plaintiffs' plans for the production.

Cityfile retracted the post and publicly apologized [4], stating: "We now realize that we could have done more to ensure that all relevant facts were included in the article. We have retracted the article and remove it from our website, and regret any negative and/or mistaken impressions that resulted from its publication."

Related Links: 

  • New York Times: Running Away to the Circus? No need. It's Staying Here [5]
  • CMPL: Jim Dolan Shows Why Anti-SLAPP Laws Are Good (And Why New York Needs A Better One) [6]
  • NY Post: MSG Suit: Site Scrooged Us [7]
  • Gawker: Cablevision's Jim Dolan Successfully Sues Blogger Into Submission [8]

 

Details

Web Site(s) Involved: 

Cityfile: New York
[2]

Content Type: 

  • Text

Publication Medium: 

Blog

Subject Area: 

  • Defamation
Court Information & Documents

Jurisdiction: 

  • New York

Source of Law: 

  • New York

Court Name: 

Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York

Court Type: 

State

Case Number: 

150135-2009

Relevant Documents: 

PDF icon document.pdf [9]
CMLP Information (Private)

Priority: 

1-High

CMLP Notes: 

Stylianou, Oct/09

DMLP Logo


Source URL (modified on 08/20/2014 - 11:10pm): https://www.dmlp.org/threats/dolan-v-cityfile

Links
[1] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/dolan-v-cityfile
[2] http://cityfile.com/
[3] https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/fbem/DocumentDisplayServlet?documentId=VqP9OCWO37gNNbx6EVsdUA==&system=prod
[4] http://cityfile.com/dailyfile/6651
[5] http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/29/theater/29circ.html?scp=1&sq=Run%20Away%20to%20the%20Circus?%20No%20Need.%20It&st=cse
[6] https://www.dmlp.org/blog/2009/jim-dolan-shows-why-anti-slapp-laws-are-good-and-why-new-york-needs-better-one
[7] http://www.nypost.com/p/news/regional/msg_suit_site_scrooged_us_RNsnnDkpENstPNjZfIXRnI
[8] http://gawker.com/5372325/cablevisions-jim-dolan-successfully-sues-blogger-into-submission
[9] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/document.pdf