Digital Media Law Project
Published on Digital Media Law Project (https://www.dmlp.org)

Home > World Wide Association of Specialty Programs v. PURE, Inc.

World Wide Association of Specialty Programs v. PURE, Inc. [1]

Submitted by DMLP Staff on Wed, 03/19/2008 - 14:48

Summary

Threat Type: 

Lawsuit

Date: 

01/04/2002

Status: 

Concluded

Disposition: 

Dismissed (partial)
Verdict (defendant)

Location: 

Utah

Verdict or Settlement Amount: 

N/A

Legal Claims: 

Defamation
Tortious Interference
Unfair Competition
World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools ("World Wide") is a Utah corporation that provides referral services, counseling, and recomendations with regard to schools and residential treatment programs for troubled and at-risk teenagers. In January 2002, World Wide sued PURE Foundation,... read full description
Parties

Party Issuing Legal Threat: 

World Wide Association of Specialty Programs, Inc.

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

PURE, Inc.; Sue Scheff; Jeff Berryman

Type of Party: 

Organization

Type of Party: 

Individual
Organization

Location of Party: 

  • Utah

Location of Party: 

  • Florida
  • Pennsylvania

Legal Counsel: 

Dennis Conroy, Spencer Siebers

Legal Counsel: 

C. Richard Henriksen, James Seaman, Aaron Flater
Description

World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools ("World Wide") is a Utah corporation that provides referral services, counseling, and recomendations with regard to schools and residential treatment programs for troubled and at-risk teenagers. In January 2002, World Wide sued PURE Foundation, Inc., Sue Scheff, and Jeff Berryman in federal district court in Utah after Ms. Scheff and Mr. Berryman made negative comments about World Wide on various Internet sites. The dispute arose when Scheff sent her teenage daughter to a World Wide-affiliated school, removed her daughter from the school, sharply criticized World Wide's practices on her website and various Internet chatrooms (allegedly in conjunction with Berryman), and then founded PURE, a competing service.

World Wide 's complaint alleged defamation, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, and unfair business practices under the Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. sec. 1125(a) [2]). After lengthy proceedings, the trial court granted summary judgment for Mr. Berryman and dismissed the case against him. World Wide's case against Ms. Scheff went to trial, and the jury found in her favor on all counts. World Wide appealed, and the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed.

Related Links: 

Wikipedia: World Wide Association of Specialty Programs and Schools
[3]

 

Details

Content Type: 

  • Text

Publication Medium: 

Forum
Print
Verbal
Website

Subject Area: 

  • Defamation
  • Business Torts
Court Information & Documents

Jurisdiction: 

  • Utah

Source of Law: 

  • United States
  • Utah

Court Name: 

United States District Court for the District of Utah; United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Court Type: 

Federal

Case Number: 

2:02-CV-00010 (trial level); 04-4312 (appellate level)

Relevant Documents: 

PDF icon 2006-06-13-Tenth Circuit Opinion in World Wide v. PURE, Inc..pdf [4]
PDF icon 2002-12-02-PURE's Answer.pdf [5]
PDF icon 2002-12-19-World Wide's Amended Complaint.pdf [6]
PDF icon 2003-01-08-PURE's Answer to Amended Complaint.pdf [7]
PDF icon 2003-04-2003-Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction.pdf [8]
PDF icon 2003-05-01-PURE's Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction.pdf [9]
PDF icon 2004-05-17-Berryman's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment.pdf [10]
PDF icon 2004-07-16-Order Granting Summary Judgment as to Berryman.pdf [11]
PDF icon 2004-08-06-Verdict Form.pdf [12]
PDF icon 2004-05-18-Scheff and PURE's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment.pdf [13]

DMLP Logo


Source URL (modified on 08/20/2014 - 11:03pm): https://www.dmlp.org/threats/world-wide-association-specialty-programs-v-pure-inc

Links
[1] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/world-wide-association-specialty-programs-v-pure-inc
[2] http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode15/usc_sec_15_00001125----000-.html
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wide_Association_of_Specialty_Programs_and_Schools
[4] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2006-06-13-Tenth%20Circuit%20Opinion%20in%20World%20Wide%20v.%20PURE%2C%20Inc..pdf
[5] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2002-12-02-PURE%27s%20Answer.pdf
[6] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2002-12-19-World%20Wide%27s%20Amended%20Complaint.pdf
[7] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2003-01-08-PURE%27s%20Answer%20to%20Amended%20Complaint.pdf
[8] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2003-04-2003-Memorandum%20of%20Law%20in%20Support%20of%20Plaintiff%27s%20Motion%20for%20Preliminary%20Injunction.pdf
[9] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2003-05-01-PURE%27s%20Memorandum%20in%20Opposition%20to%20Motion%20for%20Preliminary%20Injunction.pdf
[10] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2004-05-17-Berryman%27s%20Memorandum%20in%20Support%20of%20Motion%20for%20Summary%20Judgment.pdf
[11] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2004-07-16-Order%20Granting%20Summary%20Judgment%20as%20to%20Berryman.pdf
[12] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2004-08-06-Verdict%20Form.pdf
[13] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2004-05-18-Scheff%20and%20PURE%27s%20Memorandum%20in%20Support%20of%20Motion%20for%20Summary%20Judgment.pdf