Digital Media Law Project
Published on Digital Media Law Project (https://www.dmlp.org)

Home > Exodus Int'l v. Watt

Exodus Int'l v. Watt [1]

Submitted by DMLP Staff on Mon, 09/10/2007 - 15:59

Summary

Threat Type: 

Correspondence

Date: 

03/01/2006

Status: 

Concluded

Location: 

California

Verdict or Settlement Amount: 

N/A

Legal Claims: 

Copyright Infringement
Trademark Infringement
Mr. Watt altered a photograph of a billboard that he found on the website of "ex-gay" ministry, Exodus International, and posted it on his blog. The billboard originally read "Gay? Unhappy? www.exodus.to", and Watt altered it to read "Straight? Unhappy? www.gay.com". Through... read full description
Parties

Party Issuing Legal Threat: 

Exodus International

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

Justin Watt

Type of Party: 

Organization

Type of Party: 

Individual

Location of Party: 

  • Florida

Location of Party: 

  • California

Legal Counsel: 

Mathew Staver

Legal Counsel: 

Laurence Pulgram
Description

Mr. Watt altered a photograph of a billboard that he found on the website of "ex-gay" ministry, Exodus International, and posted it on his blog. The billboard originally read "Gay? Unhappy? www.exodus.to", and Watt altered it to read "Straight? Unhappy? www.gay.com".

Through counsel, Exodus sent Watt a cease-and-desist letter, claiming that his alteration and use of the billboard image infringed Exodus's trademark and copyright rights. The letter demanded that he immediately remove the image from his website.

Watt contacted the ACLU, which put him in touch with attorneys at Fenwick & West, who wrote a response to Exodus on Watt's behalf. Watt's response letter argued, with respect to the copyright claim, that his use of the photograph constituted fair use. With respect to the trademark claim, Watt's letter argued that he did not make a commercial use of Exodus's mark, and furthermore that there was no likelihood of confusion as to the source or sponsorship of the image posted on Watt's blog because his message was so fundamentally antithetical to Exodus's message.

Exodus's lawyers subsequently announced that they would not be suing Watt.

Related Links: 

ACLU: Exodus Parody [2]

ACLU: ACLU Defends Blogger's Right to Parody "Ex-Gay" Group [3]

ACLU Case Profile [2]

USA Today: Christian Group Back Off Case Against Blog Parody [4]

The New York Times: Both Sides in Parody Dispute Agree on a Term: Unhappy [5]

 

Details

Web Site(s) Involved: 

Justinsomnia [6]

Content Type: 

  • Photo

Publication Medium: 

Blog

Subject Area: 

  • Copyright
  • Fair Use
  • Trademark
Court Information & Documents

Jurisdiction: 

  • California

Source of Law: 

  • United States

Relevant Documents: 

PDF icon watts cease and desist response.pdf [7]
PDF icon watt cease and desist letter.pdf [8]

DMLP Logo


Source URL (modified on 08/20/2014 - 11:03pm): https://www.dmlp.org/threats/exodus-intl-v-watt

Links
[1] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/exodus-intl-v-watt
[2] http://aclu.org/lgbt/discrim/24716res20060322.html
[3] http://aclu.org/lgbt/discrim/24714prs20060322.html
[4] http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2006-03-23-aclu-blog-case_x.htm
[5] http://www.nytimes.com/2006/03/27/technology/27straight.html?_r=1&ex=1144126800&en=42201a1112fa6eec&ei=5070&emc=eta1&oref=slogin
[6] http://justinsomnia.org
[7] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/watts%20cease%20and%20desist%20response.pdf
[8] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/watt%20cease%20and%20desist%20letter.pdf