Digital Media Law Project
Published on Digital Media Law Project (https://www.dmlp.org)

Home > Alvis Coatings, Inc. v. Does

Alvis Coatings, Inc. v. Does [1]

Submitted by DMLP Staff on Mon, 09/24/2007 - 17:04

Summary

Threat Type: 

Lawsuit

Date: 

07/30/2004

Status: 

Concluded

Disposition: 

Withdrawn

Location: 

North Carolina

Verdict or Settlement Amount: 

N/A

Legal Claims: 

Defamation
Tortious Interference
Trademark Infringement
Unfair Competition
Alvis Coatings sells coating products, including "Alvis Spray-on Siding". The company filed a John Doe lawsuit in 2004 in North Carolina federal court against ten anonymous defendants, alleging that certain anonymous postings about its products violated the Lanham Act and North... read full description
Parties

Party Issuing Legal Threat: 

Alvis Coatings, Inc.

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

John Does 1-10

Type of Party: 

Organization

Type of Party: 

Individual

Location of Party: 

  • North Carolina

Legal Counsel: 

Jason M. Sneed

Legal Counsel: 

John T. Hermann
Description

Alvis Coatings sells coating products, including "Alvis Spray-on Siding". The company filed a John Doe lawsuit in 2004 in North Carolina federal court against ten anonymous defendants, alleging that certain anonymous postings about its products violated the Lanham Act and North Carolina state laws prohibiting unfair and deceptive trade practices, unfair competition and defamation.

According to court documents, Alvis alleged that, in 2003, internet user(s) posted sixteen messages on home improvement message boards, including bobvila.com [2] and oldhouse.com [3], about Alvis's products. The unknown poster(s) allegedly commented that Alvis Spray-on Siding was "Duron's siding in a can, privately labelled by Alvis" and that Alvis's officers and dealers were "criminals."

After filing suit, Alvis successfully obtained an order to conduct limited and expedited discovery and thereby obtained from the operators of bobvila.com [2] and oldhouse.com [3] the identity of two relevant ISPs, Roadrunner and Comcast.

When subpoeanaed by Alvis, Comcast refused to provide Alvis with information identifying its customer, and the anonymous poster, under the John Doe moniker, filed a motion to quash the subpoena. He claimed that the subpoena threatened his First Amendent right to anonymous speech.

On December 2, 2004, the Court denied the defendant's motion to quash, applying the "prima facie" standard from Doe v. 2TheMart.com, 140 F. Supp.2d 1088 (W.D. Wash. 2001) [4] (holding that the plaintiff is entitled to discover the defendant's identity when it can establish a prima facie case against him). The Court held that Alvis was entitled under this standard to compell Comcast to produce information relating to the Doe defendants' identity.

Update:

2/28/06 - Court dismissed the case due to plaintiffs' failure to prosecute the case.

Related Links: 

CyberSLAPP: Alvis Coatings v. John Does 1 through 10 [5]

Details

Web Site(s) Involved: 

bobvila.com [6]

oldhouse.com [3]

Content Type: 

  • Text

Publication Medium: 

Forum

Subject Area: 

  • Defamation
  • Trademark
  • Anonymity
  • Trade Libel
  • Business Torts
Court Information & Documents

Jurisdiction: 

  • North Carolina

Source of Law: 

  • United States
  • North Carolina

Court Name: 

United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Court Type: 

Federal

Case Number: 

3:04-cv-00374-CH

Relevant Documents: 

PDF icon 2004-12-02-Decision on Motion to Quash.pdf [7]
PDF icon Motion to quash.pdf [8]
PDF icon Opposition to motion to quash.pdf [9]
PDF icon Hartman declaration.pdf [10]
PDF icon 2006-02-28-Order of Dismissal for Failure to Prosecute.pdf [11]

DMLP Logo


Source URL (modified on 08/20/2014 - 11:04pm): https://www.dmlp.org/threats/alvis-coatings-inc-v-does

Links
[1] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/alvis-coatings-inc-v-does
[2] http://www.bobvila.com
[3] http://www.oldhouse.com/
[4] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2001-04-26%20Order.pdf
[5] http://www.cyberslapp.org/cases/page.cfm?pageID=17
[6] http://www.bobvila.com/
[7] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2004-12-02-Decision%20on%20Motion%20to%20Quash.pdf
[8] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/Motion%20to%20quash.pdf
[9] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/Opposition%20to%20motion%20to%20quash.pdf
[10] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/Hartman%20declaration.pdf
[11] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2006-02-28-Order%20of%20Dismissal%20for%20Failure%20to%20Prosecute.pdf