Digital Media Law Project
Published on Digital Media Law Project (https://www.dmlp.org)

Home > Righthaven LLC v. Vote For The Worst, LLC

Righthaven LLC v. Vote For The Worst, LLC [1]

Submitted by DMLP Staff on Mon, 04/18/2011 - 16:46

Summary

Threat Type: 

Lawsuit

Date: 

06/28/2010

Status: 

Pending

Location: 

Nevada

Verdict or Settlement Amount: 

N/A

Legal Claims: 

Copyright Infringement
On June 28, 2010, Righthaven LLC, a Las Vegas company associated with Las Vegas Review-Journal owner Stephens Media LLC, filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against the website company Vote for the Worst ("VFTW") LLC and two of its managers, David Della Terza... read full description
Parties

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

Vote For The Worst, LLC,, Nathan Palmer, David J. Della Terza

Type of Party: 

Organization

Type of Party: 

Individual
Organization

Location of Party: 

  • Nevada

Location of Party: 

  • Utah

Legal Counsel: 

John Charles Coons, Joseph C. Chu, and Anne Pieroni of Righthaven LLC; Steven A. Gibson of Dickinson Wright PLLC; Shawn A. Mangano

Legal Counsel: 

Marc Randazza and James M DeVoy of Randazza Legal Group; John L. Krieger and Nikkya G. Williams of Lewis and Roca LLP
Description

On June 28, 2010, Righthaven LLC, a Las Vegas company associated with Las Vegas Review-Journal owner Stephens Media LLC, filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against the website company Vote for the Worst ("VFTW") LLC and two of its managers, David Della Terza and Nathan Palmer.  Righthaven sued [2] VFTW after a user posted a Las Vegas Review-Journal article on the site's forum.

On August 16, 2010, VFTW moved to dismiss.  VFTW argued that the court lacked personal jurisdiction because none of the defendants are residents of or have sufficient contacts with Nevada.  The court denied [3] VFTW's motion on March 30, 2011.

VFTW filed an answer [4] on April 13, 2011, asserting defenses of fair use, lack of personal and subject matter jurisdiction, and innocent infringement. 

Update:

4/17/2011 - VFTW filed a motion to dismiss [5] for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, based on the recently-unsealed agreement that purported to assign Stephens Media's copyright in various content to Righthaven.  Hoehn argued that the agreement, which was unsealed by the court hearing Righthaven LLC v. Democratic Underground LLC [6], shows that Righthaven lacks the standing to sue because Righthaven was not the exclusive holder of any rights in the copyrighted material at issue in the lawsuit.  Under Silvers v. Sony Pictures Entm’t, Inc. [7], 402 F.3d 881 (9th Cir. 2005), a plaintiff must be the exclusive holder in a copyright to sue.  Under the unsealed agreement, Stephens Media retained exclusive rights in the works, thereby preventing Righthaven from being able to sue on the copyright.

Details

Web Site(s) Involved: 

VotefortheWorst.com [8]

Content Type: 

  • Text

Publication Medium: 

Forum

Subject Area: 

  • Copyright
  • Fair Use
  • User Comments or Submissions
Court Information & Documents

Jurisdiction: 

  • Nevada

Source of Law: 

  • United States

Court Name: 

United States District Court for the District of Nevada

Court Type: 

Federal

Case Number: 

2:10-cv-01045

Relevant Documents: 

PDF icon 2011-04-17-Vote for the Worst's Motion to Dismiss.pdf [9]
PDF icon 2010-06-28-Righthaven's Complaint Against Vote for the Worst.pdf [10]
PDF icon 2010-08-16-Vote for the Worst's Motion to Dismiss.pdf [11]
PDF icon 2010-09-01-Righthaven's Opposition to Vote for the Worst's Motion to Dismiss.pdf [12]
PDF icon 2011-03-30-Order Denying Vote for the Worst's Motion to Dismiss.pdf [13]

DMLP Logo


Source URL (modified on 08/20/2014 - 11:11pm): https://www.dmlp.org/threats/righthaven-llc-v-vote-worst-llc

Links
[1] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/righthaven-llc-v-vote-worst-llc
[2] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2010-06-28-Righthaven%27s%20Complaint%20Against%20Vote%20for%20the%20Worst.pdf
[3] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2011-03-30-Order%20Denying%20Vote%20for%20the%20Worst%27s%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.pdf
[4] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2011-04-13-Vote%20for%20the%20Worst%27s%20Answer.pdf
[5] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2011-04-17-Vote%20for%20the%20Worst%27s%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.pdf
[6] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/righthaven-v-democratic-underground
[7] http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6988744315769473811&hl=en&as_sdt=2&as_vis=1&oi=scholarr
[8] http://www.votefortheworst.com/
[9] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2011-04-17-Vote%20for%20the%20Worst%27s%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.pdf
[10] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2010-06-28-Righthaven%27s%20Complaint%20Against%20Vote%20for%20the%20Worst.pdf
[11] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2010-08-16-Vote%20for%20the%20Worst%27s%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.pdf
[12] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2010-09-01-Righthaven%27s%20Opposition%20to%20Vote%20for%20the%20Worst%27s%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.pdf
[13] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2011-03-30-Order%20Denying%20Vote%20for%20the%20Worst%27s%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.pdf