Digital Media Law Project
Published on Digital Media Law Project (https://www.dmlp.org)

Home > Rowling v. RDR Books

Rowling v. RDR Books [1]

Submitted by DMLP Staff on Fri, 12/07/2007 - 11:17

Summary

Threat Type: 

Lawsuit

Date: 

10/31/2007

Status: 

Concluded

Disposition: 

Injunction Issued
Verdict (plaintiff)

Location: 

New York

Verdict or Settlement Amount: 

$6,750.00

Legal Claims: 

Copyright Infringement
False Advertising
Trademark Infringement
Unfair Competition
J.K. Rowling, the author of the successful Harry Potter books and films, and Warner Brothers, which produces and markets Harry Potter movies and products, filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against book publisher RDR Books in the United States District Court for the... read full description
Parties

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

RDR Books; John Does 1-10

Type of Party: 

Individual
Large Organization

Type of Party: 

Individual
Organization

Location of Party: 

  • California
  • Delaware
  • United Kingdom

Location of Party: 

  • Michigan

Legal Counsel: 

Dale Margaret Cendali, Johanna Schmitt, Melanie Bradley

Legal Counsel: 

David S. Hammer; Anthony Falzone; Lawrence Lessig
Description

J.K. Rowling, the author of the successful Harry Potter books and films, and Warner Brothers, which produces and markets Harry Potter movies and products, filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against book publisher RDR Books in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Rowlings and Warner Brothers seek an injunction barring RDR Books from publishing The Harry Potter Lexicon, the print counterpart of the Harry Potter fan website, www.hp-lexicon.com [2]. The website contains information on "the series’ characters, places, animals, magic spells, and potions along with atlases, timelines, and analyses of magical theory," according to a press release [3] issued by Stanford Law School's Fair Use Project, which is acting a co-counsel to RDR Books in the case.

Rowling and Warner Brothers argue that the book, which had been scheduled to be released November 28, 2007, misappropriates elements of Rowling's imaginary world and otherwise violates the plaintiffs' copyright and trademark rights in the books, movies, and related products. RDR argues that it has the right to publish the Lexicon under the fair use doctrine, which is a defense to copyright infringement that permits the use of a copyrighted work without the copyright owner's permission for limited and "transformative" uses that do not damage the market for the original work.

On November 8, 2007, the court issued a temporary restraining order delaying RDR's publication of the book. Both parties agreed to the entry of this order, pending a hearing on a preliminary injunction scheduled for February 6, 2008.

Update:

The court decided to combine the preliminary injunction hearing with a trial on the merits, which is scheduled to begin April 14, 2008.

4/16/2008 - The trial ended, and the court took the matter under advisement.

9/8/2008 - Judge Patterson issued a decision [4] finding the defendants liable for copyright infringement; judge issued permanent injunction and $6,750 in statutory damages.

12/4/08 - RDR Books dismissed its appeal and announced that it will publish a revised version of The Lexicon on on January 12, 2009.  Mr. Vander Ark substantially rewrote the book in an effort to bring it in line with Judge Patterson's decision.  J.K. Rowling's agents issued the following statement [5]:

We are delighted that this matter is finally and favourably resolved and that J.K. Rowling's rights  -- and indeed the rights of all authors of creative works -- have been protected.  We are also pleased to hear that rather than continue to litigate, RDR have themselves decided to publish a different book prepared with reference to Judge Patterson's decision.

Related Links: 

  • Justia: Case Docket [6]
  • The Patry Copyright Blog: Harry Potter Lexicon Suit [7]
  • WSJ Law Blog: Harry Potter & the Copyright Infringement Lawsuit [8]
  • Ars Technica: Infringus maximus! Rowling gets injunction against Harry Potter Lexicon [9]
  • Press Release: Stanford Law School's Fair Use Project to Represent RDR Books in 'Harry Potter' Copyright Lawsuit [10]
  • RDR Books Website [11]
  • New York Times: A Tight Grip Can Choke Creativity [12]
  • Info/Law: Harry Potter and the Lexicon of Fair Use [13]
  • Entertainment & Media Law Blog: J.K. Rowling Wins Fair-Use Case Against Harry Potter Encyclopedia [14]
  • Info/Law: Rowling 1, Lexicon 0 [15]
  • CMLP Blog: Judge Rejects Fair Use Defense in Harry Potter Lexicon Case, J.K. Rowling Recovers Her Plums [16]
  • The Leaky Cauldron: RDR Books Withdraws Appeal [5]
  • The Associated Press: Revised 'Harry Potter' encyclopedia to be released [17]
  • The Muskegon Chronicle: Local publisher revamps, will pubish Harry Potter 'Lexicon' [18]
Details

Web Site(s) Involved: 

www.hp-lexicon.com [2]

Content Type: 

  • Text

Publication Medium: 

Print
Website

Subject Area: 

  • Copyright
  • Fair Use
  • Trademark
Court Information & Documents

Jurisdiction: 

  • New York

Source of Law: 

  • United States
  • New York

Court Name: 

United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

Court Type: 

Federal

Case Number: 

07 Civ. 9667

Relevant Documents: 

PDF icon 2007-10-31-Harry Potter Complaint.pdf [19]
PDF icon 2007-11-08-TRO-Southern District of New York.pdf [20]
PDF icon 2007-11-02-Warner and Rowling's Order to Show Cause re Injunction.pdf [21]
PDF icon 2008-01-15-Rowling Memorandum in Favor of Preliminary Injunction.pdf [22]
PDF icon 2008-02-08-RDR Books' Memorandum in Opposition to Preliminary Injunction.pdf [23]
PDF icon 2008-09-08-Rowling Decision.pdf [24]
PDF icon 2008-11-06-RDR Books Notice of Appeal.pdf [25]

DMLP Logo


Source URL (modified on 08/20/2014 - 11:04pm): https://www.dmlp.org/threats/rowling-v-rdr-books

Links
[1] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/rowling-v-rdr-books
[2] http://www.hp-lexicon.com
[3] https://www.dmlp.org/the%20series%E2%80%99%20characters,%20places,%20animals,%20magic%20spells,%20and%20potions%20along%20with%20atlases,%20timelines,%20and%20analyses%20of%20magical%20theory.
[4] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-09-08-Rowling%20Decision.pdf
[5] http://www.the-leaky-cauldron.org/2008/12/4/jkrwb-vs-rdr-books-trial-rdr-books-withdraws-appeal
[6] http://dockets.justia.com/docket/court-nysdce/case_no-1:2007cv09667/case_id-315790/
[7] http://williampatry.blogspot.com/2007/11/harry-potter-lexicon-suit.html
[8] http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2007/11/02/harry-potter-the-copyright-infringement-lawsuit/
[9] http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071114-infringus-maximus-rowling-wins-injunction-against-harry-potter-lexicon.html
[10] http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20071204005361&newsLang=en
[11] http://www.rdrbooks.com/
[12] http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/09/business/09nocera.html
[13] http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/03/15/harry-potter-and-the-lexicon-of-fair-use/
[14] http://reporter.blogs.com/thresq/2008/09/jk-rowling-wins.html
[15] http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/infolaw/2008/09/08/rowling-1-lexicon-0/
[16] https://www.dmlp.org/blog/2008/judge-rejects-fair-use-defense-harry-potter-lexicon-case-jk-rowling-recovers-her-plums
[17] http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hIGNIcztySvpGhm95iGPhNL7ov1AD94SNAQO1
[18] http://www.mlive.com/chronicle/news/index.ssf/2008/12/local_publisher_revamps_harry.html
[19] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2007-10-31-Harry%20Potter%20Complaint.pdf
[20] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2007-11-08-TRO-Southern%20District%20of%20New%20York.pdf
[21] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2007-11-02-Warner%20and%20Rowling%27s%20Order%20to%20Show%20Cause%20re%20Injunction.pdf
[22] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-01-15-Rowling%20Memorandum%20in%20Favor%20of%20Preliminary%20Injunction.pdf
[23] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-02-08-RDR%20Books%27%20Memorandum%20in%20Opposition%20to%20Preliminary%20Injunction.pdf
[24] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-09-08-Rowling%20Decision.pdf
[25] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-11-06-RDR%20Books%20Notice%20of%20Appeal.pdf