Digital Media Law Project
Published on Digital Media Law Project (https://www.dmlp.org)

Home > Powermark Homes v. John Doe

Powermark Homes v. John Doe [1]

Submitted by DMLP Staff on Tue, 09/23/2008 - 23:38

Summary

Threat Type: 

Lawsuit

Date: 

05/25/2007

Status: 

Pending

Disposition: 

Dismissed (total)

Location: 

Ohio

Verdict or Settlement Amount: 

N/A

Legal Claims: 

Defamation
False Light
Right of Publicity
Trade Libel
Powermark Homes Inc., a homebuilder in Ohio, and two of its principals, Mark and Lisa Powers, sued the anonymous operator of Powermark Homes Alert.  At the time of the suit, the homepage for the site included a picture of Mark... read full description
Parties

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

John Doe; Domains By Proxy Inc.

Type of Party: 

Individual
Organization

Type of Party: 

Individual
Organization

Location of Party: 

  • Ohio

Legal Counsel: 

Bruce W McClain; Thomas P. Maczuzak

Legal Counsel: 

Edward A Icove; Gregory A Beck - Public Citizen Litigation Group; Christopher Bechhold
Description

Powermark Homes Inc., a homebuilder in Ohio, and two of its principals, Mark and Lisa Powers, sued the anonymous operator of Powermark Homes Alert [2].  At the time of the suit, the homepage for the site included a picture of Mark and Lisa Powers and the statements "The Truth Exposed" and "Do you really want to do business with this Ohio Home Builder?"

On May 25, 2007, Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit [3] against the site's operator identified only as "John Doe" and against Domains By Proxy Inc., the site's domain name registrar, asserting claims of defamation, misappropriation, false-light publicity, and disparagement.  Plaintiffs also sought a temporary restraining order "requiring Defendants to remove the false and defamatory website."  Neither the original complaint [3] nor plaintiffs' amended complaint [4] appear to identify with specificity the statements they claim are false and defamatory.

Plaintiffs subpoenaed Domains by Proxy for Doe's identifying information and also sent them DMCA takedown notices [5]demanding that the site be taken down.   After Domains by Proxy notified Doe, he filed a pro se, anonymous answer and several motions to quash.  Shortly after Doe made these filings, the Public Citizen Litigation Group entered the case on Doe's behalf filed briefs [6] in support of Doe's motions.

Update:

12/15/2008 - Court granted Doe and Domains by Proxy's motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment respectively.  No written order was issued.  Docket entry reads:

D1 John Doe(Real Name Unknown) Motion To Dismiss Pltfs' Amended Complaint Edward A Icove 0019646, Filed 08/28/2007, Is Granted. D2 Domains By Proxy Inc. Motion For Summary Judgment Christopher Bechhold 0014192, Filed 10/11/2007, Is Granted. Final. Court Cost Assessed To The Plaintiff(S).

Related Links: 

  • Ars Technica: Corporate critics feel the stinging lash of DMCA misuse [7]
  • Techdirt: DMCA Abused To Get Sucks Site Taken Down [8]
  • Public Citizen CL&P Blog: How to Use the DMCA to Squelch Consumer Criticism [9]
  • Public Citizen Litigation Group: Powermark Homes v. Doe [10]
  • Powermark Homes Alert: Case Filings [11]
  • Cleveland Plain Dealer: Web site critical of Lorain County home builder wins court battle [12]
  • CMLP Blog: Anonymous Gripe Site Wins Legal Battle With Ohio Homebuilder Powermark Homes [13]
  • Cuyahoga County Court Case Summary [14]
Details

Web Site(s) Involved: 

Powermark Homes Alert [2]

Content Type: 

  • Text

Publication Medium: 

Website

Subject Area: 

  • Defamation
  • Anonymity
  • Gripe Sites
Court Information & Documents

Jurisdiction: 

  • Ohio

Source of Law: 

  • Ohio

Court Name: 

Common Pleas Court, Cuyahoga County, Ohio

Court Type: 

State

Case Number: 

CV 07-625465

Relevant Documents: 

PDF icon 2007-07-10-Public_Citizens_Memorandum_in_Support_of_Motion_to_Quash_Subpoena_and_Complaint.pdf [15]
PDF icon 2007-07-23-Response_to_Plaintiffs_Motion_for_Preliminary_Injunction.pdf [16]
PDF icon 2007-08-09-Response_to_Plaintiffs_Motion_for_Temporary_Restraining_Order.pdf [17]
PDF icon 2007-05-25-Powermark Complaint.pdf [18]
PDF icon 2007-06-11-Powermark Amended Motion for TRO.pdf [19]
PDF icon 2007-08-23-Transcript of Hearing.pdf [20]
PDF icon 2007-08-28-Powermark Brief in Opposition to Motion to Quash.pdf [21]
PDF icon 2007-10-15-Doe Motion to Quash Subpoena and for Protective Order.pdf [22]
PDF icon 2007-08-09-Powermark Amended Complaint.pdf [23]
PDF icon 2007-10-29-Powermark Homes Motion To Compel and Opposition To Protective Order.pdf [24]
PDF icon 2007-10-29-Maczuzak Motion to Withraw.pdf [25]
CMLP Information (Private)

Priority: 

1-High

Threat Source: 

Public Citizen

DMLP Logo


Source URL (modified on 08/20/2014 - 11:04pm): https://www.dmlp.org/threats/powermark-homes-v-john-doe

Links
[1] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/powermark-homes-v-john-doe
[2] http://powermarkhomessucks.com/
[3] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2007-05-25-Powermark%20Complaint.pdf
[4] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2007-08-09-Powermark%20Amended%20Complaint.pdf
[5] http://powermarkhomessucks.com/PHI_exhibitA.htm
[6] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2007-07-10-Public_Citizens_Memorandum_in_Support_of_Motion_to_Quash_Subpoena_and_Complaint.pdf
[7] http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071011-corporate-critics-feel-the-stinging-lash-of-dmca-misuse.html
[8] http://techdirt.com/articles/20071010/162619.shtml
[9] http://pubcit.typepad.com/clpblog/2007/10/how-to-use-the-.html
[10] http://www.citizen.org/litigation/briefs/IntFreeSpch/cases/articles.cfm?ID=14267#powermark
[11] http://powermarkhomessucks.com/LAWSUIT.html
[12] http://blog.cleveland.com/metro/2009/01/web_site_critical_of_lorain_co.html
[13] https://www.dmlp.org/blog/2009/anonymous-gripe-site-wins-legal-battle-ohio-homebuilder-powermark-homes
[14] http://cpdocket.cp.cuyahogacounty.us/p_CV_Docket.aspx
[15] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2007-07-10-Public_Citizens_Memorandum_in_Support_of_Motion_to_Quash_Subpoena_and_Complaint.pdf
[16] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2007-07-23-Response_to_Plaintiffs_Motion_for_Preliminary_Injunction.pdf
[17] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2007-08-09-Response_to_Plaintiffs_Motion_for_Temporary_Restraining_Order.pdf
[18] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2007-05-25-Powermark%20Complaint.pdf
[19] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2007-06-11-Powermark%20Amended%20Motion%20for%20TRO.pdf
[20] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2007-08-23-Transcript%20of%20Hearing.pdf
[21] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2007-08-28-Powermark%20Brief%20in%20Opposition%20to%20Motion%20to%20Quash.pdf
[22] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2007-10-15-Doe%20Motion%20to%20Quash%20Subpoena%20and%20for%20Protective%20Order.pdf
[23] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2007-08-09-Powermark%20Amended%20Complaint.pdf
[24] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2007-10-29-Powermark%20Homes%20Motion%20To%20Compel%20and%20Opposition%20To%20Protective%20Order.pdf
[25] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2007-10-29-Maczuzak%20Motion%20to%20Withraw.pdf