Digital Media Law Project
Published on Digital Media Law Project (https://www.dmlp.org)

Home > Ben Ezra, Weinstein, and Company v. AOL

Ben Ezra, Weinstein, and Company v. AOL [1]

Submitted by DMLP Staff on Wed, 07/23/2008 - 13:51

Summary

Threat Type: 

Lawsuit

Date: 

03/01/1997

Status: 

Concluded

Disposition: 

Dismissed (total)

Location: 

New Mexico

Verdict or Settlement Amount: 

N/A

Legal Claims: 

Defamation
Negligence
In March 1997, Ben Ezra, Weinstein, and Company ("BEW") sued America Online, Inc. ("AOL") for defamation and negligence in New Mexico state court after AOL allegedly published incorrect values for BEW's stock price and share volume.  AOL removed the lawsuit... read full description
Parties

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

America Online, Inc.

Type of Party: 

Organization

Type of Party: 

Large Organization

Location of Party: 

  • New Mexico

Location of Party: 

  • Virginia
  • Delaware

Legal Counsel: 

Donna Correll, Paul J Kennedy (Pepper Hamilton); Esteban A. Aguilar, Sr. (Aguilar Law Offices); Mark A. Glenn (Moses, Dunn, Farmer & Tuthill); Joseph J. Mullins (Rodey, Dickason, Sloan, Akin & Robb)

Legal Counsel: 

John G. Baugh (Eaves, Bardacke, Baugh, Kierst & Larson ); John Payton , Patrick J. Carome, Samir Jain (Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering); Randall J. Boe (AOL); James O. Browning; Roger E. Michener (Peacock Myers)
Description

In March 1997, Ben Ezra, Weinstein, and Company ("BEW") sued America Online, Inc. [2] ("AOL") for defamation and negligence in New Mexico state court after AOL allegedly published incorrect values for BEW's stock price and share volume. 

AOL removed the lawsuit from state to federal court and moved for summary judgment. In its motion, AOL argued that it was protected from liability by section 230 of the Communications Decency Act ("CDA 230") [3] because it did not create the stock information itself, but rather hired third parties to produce it.  The court agreed [4] with AOL and dismissed the case.

BEW appealed the case to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals.   On March 14, 2000, the appeals court affirmed [5] the lower court's decision, finding that it correctly applied CDA 230.  BEW submitted a writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court, but its writ was denied on October 2, 2000.

Related Links: 

  • AOL Legal Department: Ben Ezra, Weinstein v. America Online, Inc. [6]
Details

Web Site(s) Involved: 

America Online
[2]

Content Type: 

  • Text

Publication Medium: 

Website

Subject Area: 

  • Defamation
  • Third-Party Content
  • Section 230
Court Information & Documents

Jurisdiction: 

  • New Mexico

Source of Law: 

  • New Mexico

Court Name: 

United States District Court for the District of New Mexico; United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Court Type: 

Federal

Case Number: 

1:97-cv-00485 (trial); 99-2068 (appeal)

Relevant Documents: 

PDF icon 2000-03-14-Weinstein 10th Circ Opinion.pdf [7]
PDF icon 1998-06-15-Weinstein's First Amended Complaint.pdf [8]
PDF icon 1999-03-03-Order Granting AOL Summary Judgment.pdf [9]

DMLP Logo


Source URL (modified on 08/20/2014 - 11:05pm): https://www.dmlp.org/threats/ben-ezra-weinstein-and-company-v-aol

Links
[1] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/ben-ezra-weinstein-and-company-v-aol
[2] http://www.aol.com/
[3] http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode47/usc_sec_47_00000230----000-.html
[4] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/1999-03-03-Order%20Granting%20AOL%20Summary%20Judgment.pdf
[5] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2000-03-14-Weinstein%2010th%20Circ%20Opinion.pdf
[6] http://legal.web.aol.com/decisions/dldefam/bnez.html
[7] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2000-03-14-Weinstein%2010th%20Circ%20Opinion.pdf
[8] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/1998-06-15-Weinstein%27s%20First%20Amended%20Complaint.pdf
[9] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/1999-03-03-Order%20Granting%20AOL%20Summary%20Judgment.pdf