Digital Media Law Project
Published on Digital Media Law Project (https://www.dmlp.org)

Home > Hammitt v. Watson

Hammitt v. Watson [1]

Submitted by DMLP Staff on Thu, 07/03/2008 - 17:57

Summary

Threat Type: 

Lawsuit

Date: 

12/02/2007

Status: 

Concluded

Disposition: 

Withdrawn

Location: 

Georgia

Verdict or Settlement Amount: 

N/A

Legal Claims: 

Defamation
On December 2, 2007, Ed and Brenda Hammitt filed a lawsuit against Teresa Watson, the operator of RomeNewsByWatson.com, a news website that purports to "document . . . items of public corruption," claiming defamation and libel for publishing comments... read full description
Parties

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

Teresa Watson; RomeNewsByWatson.com, Inc.

Type of Party: 

Individual

Type of Party: 

Individual
Organization

Location of Party: 

  • Georgia

Location of Party: 

  • Georgia

Legal Counsel: 

Bobby Lee Cook; Rex B. Abernathy; Jon R. Dennis

Legal Counsel: 

Pro se
Description

On December 2, 2007, Ed and Brenda Hammitt filed a lawsuit against Teresa Watson, the operator of RomeNewsByWatson.com [2], a news website that purports to "document . . . items of public corruption," claiming defamation and libel for publishing comments made by an anonymous user of the website.

The complaint alleges that an anonymous user of RomeNewsByWatson.com, using the pseudonym "dirtyboy," accused the plaintiffs of being involved in criminal activity in a comment to an article named "Dixie Mafia Chapter 5: How to Marginalize an Opponent in Three Easy Steps [3]" that mentioned Bobby Lee Cook, one of the three attorneys representing the Hammitts. The original comment has been removed from the website, but can be found in Exhibit A of the complaint [4].

On December 18th, 2007, a staff reporter for RomeNewsByWatson.com reported [5] that the case was withdrawn by the plaintiffs. The report also stated that the plaintiffs had filed the lawsuit

without serving the Georgia Code Required 7-Day Demand Letter, asking for a retraction. They also neglected to file a Special Affidavit required by federal and state law on issues of Free Speech and Public Participation.

Anti-SLAPP, (Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation), laws require that affidavits be signed by both the Plaintiffs as well as their lawyers, swearing that the litigation they are filing does not impede or attempt to stifle or suppress Free Speech or other first Amendment Rights. The affidavits have to be filed either contemporaneously with the filing of the suit, or an amendment must be filed to the original suit within the first 10 days after filing of the suit.

Related Links: 

  • Rome News-Tribune: Chattooga couple suing Teresa Watson over Web posting [6]
  • Media Law Resource Center [7] (Scroll to Hammitt entry)
  • RomeNewsbyWatson.com: Dixie Mafia - Chapter 5: How to Marginalize an Opponent in Three Easy Steps [3] (Original article where comment was made)
  • RomeNewsbyWatson.com: Bobby Lee Cook Dismisses Case Against RomeNewsByWatson.com [5]
  • The Summerville News: Local Couple Sues Rome Woman for $1-Million [8]
Details

Web Site(s) Involved: 

RomeNewsByWatson.com
[2]

Content Type: 

  • Text

Publication Medium: 

Website

Subject Area: 

  • Defamation
  • SLAPP
  • Third-Party Content
Court Information & Documents

Jurisdiction: 

  • Georgia

Source of Law: 

  • Georgia

Court Name: 

Floyd County Superior Court, Georgia

Court Type: 

State

Case Number: 

07-04954

Relevant Documents: 

PDF icon 2007-12-02-Hammitt v. Watson Complaint.pdf [9]
CMLP Information (Private)

Priority: 

1-High

CMLP Notes: 

Currently trying to unpack some issues with this case. It seems there have been at least three related suits filed against Watson, at least one of which has been dropped.

Comments

Hammitt v Teresa Watson and RomeNewsByWatson.com [10]

Submitted by Teresa Watson [11] on Tue, 07/08/2008 - 23:12

Hi,

I am Teresa Watson of RomeNewsByWatson.com. I wanted to correct a few things about this case, and update a few.

The case filed by the Hammitt’s was in Floyd the first time, my home county, but was dismissed, and re-filed on Bobby Lee Cook's home turf, calling me a "Co-conspirator" with the poster "DirtyBoy", whom I have never even met, again without the O.C.G.A rule of 7-Day Demand Letter. Of course, I had already removed the post by a poster called “DirtyBoy” the minute I was served with the first suit.

Contemporaneously with the first Hammitt suit, I was also served with a subpoena to be deposed in a case involving two people I did not even know, in a case I had no knowledge of. Janice Galloway v Mayor, (of Lyerly, Georgia) Chuck Jones.

The judge in this case refused to even set a Rule Nisi for a Motion to Quash, and later forced me, through a Motion to Compel, to testify in a FOUR HOUR LONG DEPOSITION which never asked a single question about the case for which I was being deposed, and was designed to discover the identity of my news article sources, and to humiliate me about incidences in my life from 25 years ago.

This, after the lead attorney, Bobby Lee Cook, the object of much of my writing on the Dixie Mafia, called me “Miss Nipples” and a GD Bitch, for not answering his questions relative the identity of frequent poster.

All of this was also contemporaneous to another law suit, filed by the wife of one of the attorneys in the Hammitt case, for a post the same week as “Dirty Boy”. This case was filed in Floyd County, and like the first case, was dismissed and re-filed, even though the post by “Snake” was removed the minute I learned about it.

IN both NEW suits, the entire scope of Discovery, (Interrogatories, NTP and RFA)revolved around Bobby Lee Cook himself, and the sources of my information in the Public Document based stories on the Dixie Mafia.

Additionally, BLC wrote letters to EVERY advertiser I had, and threatened to add them to the law suits if they continued to advertise with me, (Yes, I have copies). Even a couple of Freebie Public Service ads were pulled.

It has now been more than six months since the second series of law suits were filed, and no movement. MY attorney called me to his office last week, and told me that BLC and Crew wanted to deal, would repay my attorneys fees for the deposition, BUT that I had to agree NOT to require a formal Dismissal, nor a written agreement, and that I could not speak about this to anyone.

In return, I was told, that both law suits would be “Continued” for the Five Year Period” at which point they would drop off of the Public Record.

I was furious, and shocked that my attorney would suggested this, with no written guarantee, and he kept insisting that the “deal” was guaranteed, and that BLC had a way to guarantee in both Chattooga County, (Hammitt) and in Floyd County, (Dennis). (Yes, I have proof he said these things - it is not the first time he has called me to his office to tell me about strange offers).

I walked out of my attorney’s office, turning down their offer, made a significant counter offer, via e-mail, which stipulated I get a signed Written Agreement and Money, which my attorney balked at. He told me I was lucky to get this offer, and then later, I learned that he had used the wrong File Number on the “Answers” in the Hammitt case.

But I think there is more which BLC is holding over my attorney’s head, or at least dangling in front of him. BLC just received a $10,000,000.00 check he has taken around town to brag about, from a Class Action law suit, which he is claiming is his percentage.

I demanded my attorney he file a Srivener’s Affidavit, and ask for a hearing to have the file corrected, but because the case, filed by Bobby Lee Cook is assigned to his daughter’s court, Chattooga County Superior Court Judge Kristina Cook Connelly, I am not hopeful. (OF course that is illegal, but it Bobby Lee Cook’s County - you know, the man who the character “Matlock” was based on?

In actuality, Bobby Lee Cook is the antithesis of “Matlock”.

Teresa Watson
706-936-0274

DMLP Logo


Source URL (modified on 08/20/2014 - 11:07pm): https://www.dmlp.org/threats/hammitt-v-watson

Links
[1] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/hammitt-v-watson
[2] http://www.romenewsbywatson.com
[3] http://www.romenewsbywatson.com/?p=1301
[4] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2007-12-02-Hammitt%20v.%20Watson%20Complaint.pdf
[5] http://www.romenewsbywatson.com/?p=1315
[6] http://news.mywebpal.com/partners/680/public/news859120.html
[7] http://www.medialaw.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Hot_Topics/Lawsuits_Against_Bloggers/Lawsuits_Against_Bloggers.htm
[8] http://thesummervillenews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=110&Itemid=2
[9] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2007-12-02-Hammitt%20v.%20Watson%20Complaint.pdf
[10] https://www.dmlp.org/comment/1044#comment-1044
[11] http://www.RomeNewsByWatson.com