Digital Media Law Project
Published on Digital Media Law Project (https://www.dmlp.org)

Home > Hobbs v. Pasdar

Hobbs v. Pasdar [1]

Submitted by DMLP Staff on Tue, 01/20/2009 - 18:05

Summary

Threat Type: 

Lawsuit

Date: 

11/25/2008

Status: 

Pending

Disposition: 

Dismissed (total)
Material Removed

Location: 

Arkansas

Verdict or Settlement Amount: 

N/A

Legal Claims: 

Defamation
False Light
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
Terry Hobbs sued Dixie Chicks singer Natalie Maines and her band mates in Arkansas state court for defamation, false light, and intentional infliction of emotional distress after Maines published a open letter on the band's website and MySpace... read full description
Parties

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

Natalie Pasdar; Natalie Pasdar, Emily Robinson, and Martha Seidel d/b/a Dixie Chicks

Type of Party: 

Individual

Type of Party: 

Individual

Location of Party: 

  • Tennessee

Location of Party: 

  • Texas

Legal Counsel: 

James Cody Hiland - Hiland Law Firm

Legal Counsel: 

D'Lesli M. Davis, Dan D. Davison - Fulbright & Jaworski; John E. Moore - Huckabay, Munson, Rowlett & Moore, P.A.; Robert B. Wellenberger - Thomson, Coe, Cousins, & Irons, L.L.P
Description

Terry Hobbs sued Dixie Chicks singer Natalie Maines and her band mates in Arkansas state court for defamation, false light, and intentional infliction of emotional distress after Maines published a open letter on the band's website [2] and MySpace blog [3] that allegedly "accused [Hobbs] of committing the murder of Steve Branch, Christopher Byers and Michael Moore." Compl. ¶ 15 [4].

In the letter, Maines (who was sued under her married name, Natalie Pasdar) encouraged readers to support the movement to free the so-called "West Memphis Three" -- Damien Echols, Jesse Misskelley, and Jason Baldwin –-three teenagers who were convicted of murdering three eight-year-old boys in 1994. The underlying story is chronicled in the HBO documentaries, Paradise Lost: The Child Murders at Robin Hood Hills [5] and Paradise Lost 2: Revelations [6], which cast doubt on the guilt of the three teenagers.

In the letter, a copy of which is attached as an exhibit to the complaint [4], Maines claimed that DNA evidence from the crime scene and other evidence linked Hobbs to the murders rather than Echols, Misskelley, and Baldwin. In so doing, she appears to have relied on Echols's petition for a writ of habeus corpus [7] challenging his conviction. The complaint also alleges that Maines made defamatory statements at a "Free the West Memphis Three" rally.

Maines and her co-defendants removed the case to Arkansas federal court in January 2009. In their answer [8], Maines and the Dixie Chicks assert the fair report privilege [9] as an affirmative defense, claiming that "[a]ll statements Defendants allegedly made were part of an official report and/or a public meeting."

UPDATE

7/20/09 - Hobbs filed a motion for partial summary judgment.

8/21/09 - Pasdar filed a motion for summary judgment.

8/24/09 - Maquire, Robison and Dixie Chicks filed a motion for summary judgment, adopting the arguments made by Pasdar.

12/01/09 - The court granted summary judgment to Pasdar, Maquire, Robison, and Dixie Chicks and dismissed the case with prejudice.

04/19/10 - Press accounts report [10] that the court ordered Hobbs to pay to Maines $17,590 to cover her legal fees. 

Related Links: 

  • On.Point: Is Media Privilege Available to Defamatory Dixie Chick? [11]
  • THR, Esq.: Dixie Chicks Want to Say Goodbye to More Than Earl [12]
  • Huffington Post: Dixie Chicks Singer Sued For Defamation [13]
  • AP: Defamation lawsuit against Dixie Chicks dismissed [14]
  • CBS: Dixie Chicks' Natalie Maines Wins "West Memphis Three" Defamation Suit [10]
  • CMLP: Dixie Chicks Face Defamation Lawsuit After Using Court Records [15]
  • CMLP: Arkansas Judge Tosses Defamation Lawsuit Against Dixie Chicks Over "West Memphis Three" Letter [16]
Details

Web Site(s) Involved: 

Dixie Chicks [17]

MySpace [3]

[17]

Content Type: 

  • Text

Publication Medium: 

Verbal
Website

Subject Area: 

  • Defamation
Court Information & Documents

Jurisdiction: 

  • Arkansas

Source of Law: 

  • Arkansas

Court Name: 

9th Division of the Circuit Court of Pulaski County, Arkansas; United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Court Type: 

Federal
State

Case Number: 

No. CV 08-13038 (state); 4:09-cv-00008 (federal)

Relevant Documents: 

PDF icon 2007-10-29-Echols Second Amended Petition for Habeus Corpus.pdf [18]
PDF icon 2009-01-07-Pasdar and Dixie Chicks Answer.pdf [19]
PDF icon 2009-01-07-Pasdar and Dixie Chicks Notice of Removal.pdf [20]
PDF icon 2008-11-25-Hobbs Complaint.pdf [21]
PDF icon 2009-07-20-Hobbs Brief in Support of Partial Summary Judgment.pdf [22]
PDF icon 2009-07-20-Hobbs Statement of Facts.pdf [23]
PDF icon 2009-08-21-Pasdar Brief in Support of Summary Judgment.pdf [24]
PDF icon 2009-08-21-Pasdar Statement of Facts.pdf [25]
PDF icon 2009-08-24-Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment of Defendants Maquire, Robison, and the Dixie Chicks.pdf [26]
PDF icon 2009-12-01-Order Granting Summary Judgment in Hobbs v. Pasdar.pdf [27]
PDF icon 2009-12-01-Judgment in Hobbs v. Pasdar.pdf [28]

DMLP Logo


Source URL (modified on 08/20/2014 - 11:08pm): https://www.dmlp.org/threats/hobbs-v-pasdar

Links
[1] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/hobbs-v-pasdar
[2] http://www.dixiechicks.com/
[3] http://www.myspace.com/dixiechicks
[4] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-11-25-Hobbs%20Complaint.pdf
[5] http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0117293/
[6] http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20000313/REVIEWS/3130301/1023
[7] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2007-10-29-Echols%20Second%20Amended%20Petition%20for%20Habeus%20Corpus.pdf
[8] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-01-07-Pasdar%20and%20Dixie%20Chicks%20Answer.pdf
[9] https://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/fair-report-privilege
[10] http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-20002775-504083.html
[11] http://www.onpointnews.com/NEWS/Is-Media-Privilege-Available-to-Defamatory-Dixie-Chick.html
[12] http://reporter.blogs.com/thresq/2009/01/dixie-chicks-case-may-put-outspokeness-on-web-to-test.html
[13] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/04/dixie-chicks-singer-sued_n_148600.html
[14] http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h6KrP6LWFVCNLBQrMxl0vLahyBWwD9CB99DO1
[15] https://www.dmlp.org/blog/2009/sam-bayard/dixie-chicks-face-defamation-lawsuit-after-using-court-records
[16] https://www.dmlp.org/blog/2009/arkansas-judge-tosses-defamation-lawsuit-against-dixie-chicks-over-west-memphis-three-lett
[17] http://www.dixiechicks.com/06_pressDetail.asp?newsID=669
[18] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2007-10-29-Echols%20Second%20Amended%20Petition%20for%20Habeus%20Corpus.pdf
[19] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-01-07-Pasdar%20and%20Dixie%20Chicks%20Answer.pdf
[20] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-01-07-Pasdar%20and%20Dixie%20Chicks%20Notice%20of%20Removal.pdf
[21] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2008-11-25-Hobbs%20Complaint.pdf
[22] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-07-20-Hobbs%20Brief%20in%20Support%20of%20Partial%20Summary%20Judgment.pdf
[23] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-07-20-Hobbs%20Statement%20of%20Facts.pdf
[24] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-08-21-Pasdar%20Brief%20in%20Support%20of%20Summary%20Judgment.pdf
[25] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-08-21-Pasdar%20Statement%20of%20Facts.pdf
[26] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-08-24-Memorandum%20in%20Support%20of%20Motion%20for%20Summary%20Judgment%20of%20Defendants%20Maquire%2C%20Robison%2C%20and%20the%20Dixie%20Chicks.pdf
[27] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-12-01-Order%20Granting%20Summary%20Judgment%20in%20Hobbs%20v.%20Pasdar.pdf
[28] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-12-01-Judgment%20in%20Hobbs%20v.%20Pasdar.pdf