Digital Media Law Project
Published on Digital Media Law Project (https://www.dmlp.org)

Home > Abourezk v. ProBush.com

Abourezk v. ProBush.com [1]

Submitted by DMLP Staff on Fri, 06/12/2009 - 01:33

Summary

Threat Type: 

Lawsuit

Date: 

05/27/2003

Status: 

Concluded

Disposition: 

Settled (total)

Location: 

South Dakota

Verdict or Settlement Amount: 

$1.00

Legal Claims: 

Defamation
On May 27, 2003, former South Dakota Senator James G. Abourezk filed a defamation suit against Michael Marino, one of the co-owners of ProBush.com, a website that "offered unconditional support of the 43rd US President, George W. Bush," based on Abourezk's... read full description
Parties

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

Probush.com, Inc.; Michael Marino; Ben Marino

Type of Party: 

Individual

Type of Party: 

Individual
Organization

Location of Party: 

  • California
  • Georgia
  • South Dakota

Location of Party: 

  • Pennsylvania

Legal Counsel: 

Charles Thomas Abourezk, Michael Charles Abourezk - Abourezk Law Firm (for Plaintiff Abourezk); Todd David Epp - Galland Law Firm, P.C. (for all plaintiffs)

Legal Counsel: 

Ronald A. Parsons, Jr. - Johnson, Heidepriem, Abdallah & Johnson, LLP (for all defendants); Kimberly J. Lanham - Janklow Law Firm, Prof. L.L.C. (for all defendants)
Description

On May 27, 2003, former South Dakota Senator James G. Abourezk [2] filed a defamation suit against Michael Marino, one of the co-owners of ProBush.com, a website that "offered unconditional support of the 43rd US President, George W. Bush," based on Abourezk's inclusion in the “Traitor List [3]” posted on site.  Abourezk claims that calling him a traitor “is libelous per se under South Dakota law [4] as it accuses the Plaintiff of a criminal act he did not commit.”  (Compl. [5] ¶ 13.)  He is seeking actual damages of $2 million, punitive damages of $3 million, the removal of all references to him on ProBush.com, and a public apology.  (Compl. 4.) 

On April 29, 2005, Abourezk filed an amended complaint [6] that include Jane Fonda and Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz as co-plaintiffs, and Ben Marino, the other co-owner of ProBush.com, as a co-defendant.

The defendants filed a motion to dismiss [7] based upon a failure to state a claim, asserting that their speech is protected by the First Amendment, arguing that including Abourezk on the “Traitor List” “does not qualify as a form of verifiable, literal falsehood that could lead anyone to believe that the website was stating a concrete, objective fact about [Abourezk].”  (Memo in Support of Motion to Dismiss [8] 18–19.)  This motion was denied [9] on March 14, 2004 by Chief Judge Lawrence L. Piersol. 

The defendants also filed a motion [10] for summary judgment.  According to Todd Epp [11], one of the lawyers for the plaintiffs, this motion was also denied.  The plaintiffs filed a motion [12] for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability.  Before this motion could be ruled on, however, the case was settled and dismissed [13] with prejudice on November 23, 2005.  According to one of ProBush.com's lawyers, as reported [14] by The Associated Press, [15] the settlement amount was $1.

Related Links: 

  • The Progressive: Abourezk Sues ProBush.com for $5 million [16]
  • First Amendment Center: Settlement reached in Abourezk 'traitor list' lawsuit [14]
  • EFF: Abourezk v. ProBush.com [17]
  • S.D. Watch: Abourezk, et al v. ProBush.com, et al Settled [11]
Details

Web Site(s) Involved: 

ProBush.com
[18]

 

Content Type: 

  • Photo
  • Text

Publication Medium: 

Website

Subject Area: 

  • Elections and Politics
  • Defamation
Court Information & Documents

Jurisdiction: 

  • South Dakota

Source of Law: 

  • South Dakota

Court Name: 

United States District Court for the Southern District of South Dakota

Court Type: 

Federal

Case Number: 

4:03-cv-04146-LLP

Relevant Documents: 

PDF icon 2003-05-27-Abourezk's Complaint.PDF [19]
PDF icon 2003-07-30-ProBush's Memo in Support of Motion to Dismiss.PDF [20]
PDF icon 2003-07-30-ProBush's Motion to Dismiss.PDF [21]
PDF icon 2003-08-22-Abourezk's Response to Motion to Dismiss.PDF [22]
PDF icon 2003-09-08-ProBush's Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Dismis.PDF [23]
PDF icon 2004-03-17-Order Denying ProBush's Motion to Dismiss.PDF [24]
PDF icon 2004-03-31-ProBush's Answer.PDF [25]
PDF icon 2005-04-29-Abourezk's Amended Complaint.PDF [26]
PDF icon 2005-05-13-ProBush's Answer to Amended Complaint.PDF [27]
PDF icon 2005-07-01-ProBush's Memo in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment.PDF [28]
PDF icon 2005-07-07-Abourezk's Memo in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.PDF [29]
PDF icon 2005-08-16-Abourezk's Brief Opposing ProBush's Motion for Summary Judgment.PDF [30]
PDF icon 2005-11-23-Order Dismissing Case Due to Settlement.PDF [31]
CMLP Information (Private)

Priority: 

1-High

CMLP Notes: 

Source: Associated Press/FirstAmendmentCenter

LB 06/05/2009

DMLP Logo


Source URL (modified on 08/20/2014 - 11:09pm): https://www.dmlp.org/threats/abourezk-v-probushcom

Links
[1] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/abourezk-v-probushcom
[2] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Abourezk
[3] http://www.probush.com/traitor.htm
[4] http://legis.state.sd.us/statutes/DisplayStatute.aspx?Type=Statute&Statute=20-11-3
[5] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2003-05-27-Abourezk%27s%20Complaint.PDF
[6] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2005-04-29-Abourezk%27s%20Amended%20Complaint.PDF
[7] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2003-07-30-ProBush%27s%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.PDF
[8] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2003-07-30-ProBush%27s%20Memo%20in%20Support%20of%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.PDF
[9] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2004-03-17-Order%20Denying%20ProBush%27s%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.PDF
[10] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2005-07-01-ProBush%27s%20Memo%20in%20Support%20of%20Motion%20for%20Summary%20Judgment.PDF
[11] http://thunewatch.squarespace.com/sdwatch/2005/11/26/abourezk-et-al-v-probushcom-et-al-settled.html
[12] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2005-07-07-Abourezk%27s%20Memo%20in%20Support%20of%20Motion%20for%20Partial%20Summary%20Judgment.PDF
[13] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2005-11-23-Order%20Dismissing%20Case%20Due%20to%20Settlement.PDF
[14] http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=16114
[15] http://www.ap.org/
[16] http://progressive.org/mag_mcabourezk
[17] http://www.eff.org/cases/abourezk-v-probush-com
[18] http://www.probush.com/
[19] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2003-05-27-Abourezk%27s%20Complaint.PDF
[20] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2003-07-30-ProBush%27s%20Memo%20in%20Support%20of%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.PDF
[21] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2003-07-30-ProBush%27s%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.PDF
[22] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2003-08-22-Abourezk%27s%20Response%20to%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.PDF
[23] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2003-09-08-ProBush%27s%20Reply%20Brief%20in%20Support%20of%20Motion%20to%20Dismis.PDF
[24] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2004-03-17-Order%20Denying%20ProBush%27s%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss.PDF
[25] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2004-03-31-ProBush%27s%20Answer.PDF
[26] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2005-04-29-Abourezk%27s%20Amended%20Complaint.PDF
[27] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2005-05-13-ProBush%27s%20Answer%20to%20Amended%20Complaint.PDF
[28] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2005-07-01-ProBush%27s%20Memo%20in%20Support%20of%20Motion%20for%20Summary%20Judgment.PDF
[29] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2005-07-07-Abourezk%27s%20Memo%20in%20Support%20of%20Motion%20for%20Partial%20Summary%20Judgment.PDF
[30] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2005-08-16-Abourezk%27s%20Brief%20Opposing%20ProBush%27s%20Motion%20for%20Summary%20Judgment.PDF
[31] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2005-11-23-Order%20Dismissing%20Case%20Due%20to%20Settlement.PDF