Digital Media Law Project
Published on Digital Media Law Project (https://www.dmlp.org)

Home > Tanner Friedman v. Doe

Tanner Friedman v. Doe [1]

Submitted by DMLP Staff on Tue, 06/30/2009 - 17:55

Summary

Threat Type: 

Lawsuit

Date: 

05/27/2009

Status: 

Pending

Disposition: 

Material Removed
Subpoena Enforced

Location: 

Michigan

Verdict or Settlement Amount: 

N/A

Legal Claims: 

Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Consumer Protection
Cybersquatting
Defamation
Tortious Interference
Trademark Infringement
Unfair Competition
TFSC, LLC, a public relations firms doing business as Tanner Friedman, is suing an unknown Twitter user in a Detroit federal district court seeking injunctive relief and damages arising out of his use of the Twitter account "tannerfriedman."  Tanner Friedman, in its... read full description
Parties

Party Receiving Legal Threat: 

John Doe

Type of Party: 

Organization

Type of Party: 

Individual

Location of Party: 

  • Michigan

Legal Counsel: 

Daniel P. Dalton - Tomkiw Dalton, PLC
Description

TFSC, LLC, a public relations firms doing business as Tanner Friedman, is suing an unknown Twitter user in a Detroit federal district court seeking injunctive relief and damages arising out of his use of the Twitter account "tannerfriedman."  Tanner Friedman, in its complaint [2], alleges that "tannerfriedman" posted "false and defamatory statement[s] regarding Tanner Friedman on the Twitter website using the hijacked name."  (Compl. [2] ¶ 14.)  Tanner Friedman also alleges that "tannerfriedman" posted tweets by legitimate Tanner Friedman employees to "mislead Twitter users that it was Plaintiff who was posting these tweets and to impugn its reputation."  (Compl. ¶ 17.). 

Besides defamation, the complaint includes claims for violation of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (18 U.S.C. § 1030 [3]), unfair competiton under federal and state law, trademark infringement under federal and state law, cyberpiracy, and intentional interference with contractual or business relations.

After filing suit, Tanner Friedman moved [4] the court for permission to subpoena [5] Twitter for identifying information about the unknown user.  The court granted [6] the motion, which was unopposed. According to The Detroit News [7], John Doe was traced to a computer at a rival firm. 

According to its blog [8], this tweet [9], and CBS-affiliated WWJ Newsradio [10], Tanner Friedman has now gained possession of the "tannerfriedman" Twitter alias.

Related Links: 

  • WWJ.com: Tanner Friedman Sues Over False Twitter Account [11]
  • DetriotNews: Records point to PR firm in 'Twittergate' [7]
  • WWJ.com: Tanner Friedman Wins Back Control Twitter Account [10]
  • johntaylorpr.com: Federal Judge sides with PR Firm on Twitter Lawsuit [12]
  • myventurepad: How Long Do You Let Your Brand’s Reputation Suffer? [13]
  • Tanner Friedman blog: LaRussa Twitter Case Still Up in the Air; Our Moves Forward [14]
  • Tanner Friedman blog: A Final(?) Word on Twittergate [8]
Details

Web Site(s) Involved: 

Twitter.com

Content Type: 

  • Text

Publication Medium: 

Micro-blog

Subject Area: 

  • Defamation
  • Trademark
  • Anonymity
  • Subpoenas
  • Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
  • Twitter
Court Information & Documents

Jurisdiction: 

  • Michigan

Source of Law: 

  • United States
  • Michigan

Court Name: 

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan

Court Type: 

Federal

Case Number: 

2:09-cv-12017

Relevant Documents: 

PDF icon 2009-05-27-Complaint.pdf [15]
PDF icon 2009-05-27-Motion for Immediate Discovery.pdf [16]
PDF icon 2009-06-04-Order Granting Motion for Immediate Discovery.pdf [17]
PDF icon 2009-06-15-Subpoena to Twitter.pdf [18]
CMLP Information (Private)

Priority: 

1-High

CMLP Notes: 

06/30/2009 - LB editing

DMLP Logo


Source URL (modified on 08/20/2014 - 11:09pm): https://www.dmlp.org/threats/tanner-friedman-v-doe

Links
[1] https://www.dmlp.org/threats/tanner-friedman-v-doe
[2] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-05-27-Complaint.pdf
[3] http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00001030----000-.html
[4] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-05-27-Motion for Immediate Discovery.pdf
[5] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-06-15-Subpoena%20to%20Twitter.pdf
[6] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-06-04-Order Granting Motion for Immediate Discovery.pdf
[7] http://detnews.com/article/20090625/BIZ04/906250363/1001/biz
[8] http://www.tannerfriedman.com/blog/?p=303
[9] http://twitter.com/tannerfriedman/status/2313950798
[10] http://www.wwj.com/Tanner-Friedman-Wins-Back-Control-Of-Twitter-Accou/4668160
[11] http://www.wwj.com/Tanner-Friedman-Sues-Over-False-Twitter-Account/4519407
[12] http://johntaylorpr.com/2009/06/28/federal-judge-sides-with-pr-firm-on-twitter-lawsuit/
[13] http://myventurepad.com/MVP/65504
[14] http://www.tannerfriedman.com/blog/?p=298
[15] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-05-27-Complaint.pdf
[16] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-05-27-Motion%20for%20Immediate%20Discovery.pdf
[17] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-06-04-Order%20Granting%20Motion%20for%20Immediate%20Discovery.pdf
[18] https://www.dmlp.org/sites/dmlp.org/files/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2009-06-15-Subpoena%20to%20Twitter.pdf